Colorless Mafia

[Red_Skeezix]

@GuiriEnEspana

Back to the game (and to avoid post padding), I’ll place a tentative vote on the best case so far today:

Vote Pedescribe

For the comment re: Tom’s role, the comment re: scum have no extra info from kills, the comment re “scum buddies”, the reasoning behind the 2 votes, and because this is Day 1 and the other cases seem somewhat less consistent…

<snipped/underlined for emphasis>

@pedescribe

@GuiriEnEspana

Back to the game (and to avoid post padding), I’ll place a tentative vote on the best case so far today:

Vote Pedescribe

Give a reason or take it off. Your laziness will hurt the town otherwise.

WHAT?!?! You accuse peeker of deliberately misquoting you, then in the same post commit the same??? I mean I don’t agree with Guiri’s reasons, but you can’t just leave them out of a quote, and then accuse the poster of laziness.

In other news, I still think Cookies is pretty scummy, and I don’t think anyone suggested that I not be scrutinized. :dubious: Where did that notion enter your head?

[peekercpa]

uh, ped you are making my case for me. i totally attributed the first part of the quote to me. the ridiculous was you. which is why i find it odd that 4 posts later you admit that scum would in fact have information which seems to be at odds with “that’s ridiculous” statement.

yes i was totaly saying that by eliminating certain information that in and of itself is information. you were the one that said that that conclusion would be “ridiculous”.

[Red_Skeezix]

NETA: “Your” in that last sentence was aimed at Cookies.

[Drain_Bead]

peeker didn’t ask a question, he said he was going to lynch anyone who brought up Millers. And then he didn’t even do that, so no baiting. Although if Freudian turns out to be Scum, I think peeker should be examined more closely. It could be that he was actually trying to bait, only got the wrong fish.

[Freudian_Slit]

@pedescribe

Give a reason or take it off. Your laziness will hurt the town otherwise.

He gave a LOT of reasons. You’re the lazy one–you’re making up reasons to make other people look scummy. Which is what scum has to do. Gee, I wonder what that says about YOU. :dubious:

[ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies]

I’m fine with where my vote is for the moment.

To Skeez: No one explicitly said that you shouldn’t be scrutinized, but no one else is publicly scrutinizing you either, hence my suggestion to do so.

[Trepa_Mayfield]

@Red_Skeezix

<snipped/underlined for emphasis>

WHAT?!?! You accuse peeker of deliberately misquoting you, then in the same post commit the same??? I mean I don’t agree with Guiri’s reasons, but you can’t just leave them out of a quote, and then accuse the poster of laziness.

In other news, I still think Cookies is pretty scummy, and I don’t think anyone suggested that I not be scrutinized. :dubious: Where did that notion enter your head?

:smack:

Ah. I typically put the reasons for voting before the vote, rather than after. I rescind that.

@peekercpa

uh, ped you are making my case for me. i totally attributed the first part of the quote to me. the ridiculous was you. which is why i find it odd that 4 posts later you admit that scum would in fact have information which seems to be at odds with “that’s ridiculous” statement.

No, you from my perspective is peeker.

[special_ed]

Vote Count with about 1 day, 5 hours and 2 minutes to go
12 Votes required to start Countdown.

(peak vote in Parenthesis)

5 Votes
*Pedescribe (6 #330) ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (86), Tom Scud (282 334), Freudian Slip (288), peekercpa (308), Mental Guy (318), GuiriEnEspaña

2 Votes
Freduian Slit (2 #298) Zeriel (230), Drain Bead (298)
peekercpa (2 #326) pedescribe (307), DiggitCamara (326)
1 Vote
amrussell (2 #218) Pedescribe (208 235), Rin Twisted (218), ToeJam (272 320)
Rin Twisted (1 #290) storyteller0910 (290)
ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (1 #315) Red Skeezix (315)
Mahaloth (1 #135) peekercpa (135 308) Tom Scud (334)
*Lynch Leader

Not Voting: Mahaloth, Nanook, USCDiver, Ichini Sanshigo, MHaye, amrussel, ToeJam

[Trepa_Mayfield]

@Freudian_Slit

He gave a LOT of reasons. You’re the lazy one–you’re making up reasons to make other people look scummy. Which is what scum has to do. Gee, I wonder what that says about YOU. :dubious:

Make up? I’ve given my reasons, and they actually happened.

[Normal_Phase]

Vote Count with about 1 day, 5 hours to go
12 Votes required to start Countdown.

(peak vote in Parenthesis)

5 Votes
*Pedescribe (6 #330) ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (86), Tom Scud (282 334), Freudian Slip (288), peekercpa (308), Mental Guy (318), Guiri (330)

2 Votes
Freudian Slit (2 #298) Zeriel (230), Drain Bead (298)
peekercpa (2 #326) pedescribe (307), DiggitCamara (326)

1 Vote
amrussell (2 #218) Pedescribe (208 235), Rin Twisted (218), ToeJam (272 320)
Rin Twisted (1 #290) storyteller0910 (290)
Mahaloth (1 #135) peekercpa (135 308), Tom Scud (334)
ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (1 #315) Red Skeezix (315)

*Lynch Leader

Not Voting: Mahaloth, Nanook, USCDiver, Ichini Sanshigo, MHaye, amrussel, ToeJam
[/QUOTE]

[Trepa_Mayfield]

@Drain_Bead

peeker didn’t ask a question, he said he was going to lynch anyone who brought up Millers. And then he didn’t even do that, so no baiting.

That is a minuscule nitpick. He attacked her, for a ridiculous reason, which was the point.

[Normal_Phase]

Well dang, Ed.

[Red_Skeezix]

@Tom_Scud

So I’m thinking, who do we have who’s gone dead silent after drawing a bit of early heat for maybe making the game seem more complicated than it is? I know he’s posted a “sorry guys I’m busy, will post later” post; but I thought peeker’s initial query of Mahaloth was solid - the guy’s modded a couple games, he ought to know what a “colorless” roleblocker can or can’t do - and his complete silence since his reply to peeker’s vote worries me.

unvote pedescribe
vote Mahaloth

I agree that the behavior is suspicious. Though, Mahaloth responded to peeker, but Rin Twisted appears to be performing the same maneuver (nothing from her since story’s vote), how did you decide between the two?

[Tom_Scud]

@pedescribe

That is a minuscule nitpick. He attacked her, for a ridiculous reason, which was the point.

Here’s the exchange:

@peekercpa

can we please kill the fuckers that want to talk about anything exotic. read the freaking lack of color. this is going to be straightforward. so anyone who wants to talk about bs is just obfuscating. lynch them immediately. sersiously if someone goes down the miller discussion route they swing just on principle.

@Freudian_Slit

Yeah, I agree with killing the miller. I mean if someone gets IDed as a scum and is all, “Well, I’m not really” and then we end up lynching someone else, we’re very likely to mislynch a townie. I’d rather get the miller out of the way because at least we’re not killing someone helpful (i.e., a doctor or RB or whatnot).

@peekercpa

there is no miller in this game unless the mods are lying. why the fuck would we talk about that which there is no possibility is my point. i mean it might be fruitful to discuss the living conditions in darfur but that really doesn’t impact the current game goal. kill the scum and sk. anyone who wants to talk about something else is just filling space.

That’s not an attack. A bit rude, maybe, but come on. Now, this is an attack.

[Tom_Scud]

@Red_Skeezix

I agree that the behavior is suspicious. Though, Mahaloth responded to peeker, but Rin Twisted appears to be performing the same maneuver (nothing from her since story’s vote), how did you decide between the two?

I like the peeker case on Maha better, mainly. There’s an element of “lynch the loud” to story’s case, which I’d like to avoid on turn one if possible.

[special_ed]

@Normal_Phase

Well dang, Ed.

hehe, sorry

[MHaye]

[color=green**To the mods (both of you).

Who is the “Freudian Slip” that is voting for Pedescribe?**[/color].

[ToeJam]

@Tom_Scud

I like the peeker case on Maha better, mainly. There’s an element of “lynch the loud” to story’s case, which I’d like to avoid on turn one if possible.

What she really that loud though?

She pretty much stated her points, and since then has gotten no real heat nor made any other comments.

Currently, I’m interested in hearing her answer to Storyteller’s remarks- how you respond, Rin?

To encourage a response, I shall add my vote to where I am focused.

So
Vote **Rin Twisted **

[ToeJam]

@Tom_Scud

I like the peeker case on Maha better, mainly. There’s an element of “lynch the loud” to story’s case, which I’d like to avoid on turn one if possible.

Also, NETA- I feel that the peeker case seems to be a bit of a “lynch the loud” in itself. Pretty much what I’m seeing is that **Peeker **seems to want to agitate people, and people don’t like being agitated. I agree with the masses on that- I find Peeks to be abrasive, but that’s not a BAD thing per se- and at least the man talks a lot.

So right now I’m looking at the others who are a little bit quieter in the meantime, as there are plenty of people on the **PeeksWagon **as it were. I’d like to hear from the piccolos and triangles instead of just the giant bassoon that is Peeks.

[Freudian_Slit]

@pedescribe

Make up? I’ve given my reasons, and they actually happened.

You said that Guiri had no real reasons for voting for you. But he/she did:

For the comment re: Tom’s role, the comment re: scum have no extra info from kills, the comment re “scum buddies”, the reasoning behind the 2 votes, and because this is Day 1 and the other cases seem somewhat less consistent…

You said that Guiri needed to give a reason or take it off. Guiri gave good, solid reasons for voting for you. Stop mischaracterizing what other people are saying.