Yeah, and then I rescinded that. Other than that, though.
You’re building up a history of that, though. You attack or make assertions about people, you get called on it, you back off. To my mind, this is scummy because townies can have convictions. They can hold fast to an idea and defend it vigorously without fear of looking like they’re mafia because they know they’re not. Scum has a vested interest in not attracting too much attention, in not being the controversial ones. So they try to play it safe. They back off a lot–which is what I see you as doing. Putting ideas out there and then trying to be all, “My bad, I didn’t mean that” when people call you out on your ridiculous plays.
See, you would have a point if the things I backed off on weren’t obviously idiotic. The two things I backed off on were indefensible, to the point that any defense of it would have gained me more votes than I have now. So I backed off on those. But look at Peeker. My voting him is obviously controversial. Am I backing off? No. Because I am convinced he’s scum.
hee hee. will you at least admit that you started out by saying that scum get no additional information from various Night kill possibilities or lack thereof and now you are saying that they get some, just not as much as might otherwise be possible?
or is this another indefensible point?
see the other metagame thing i have observed is that scum like to go silent with just a little heat but love to start swinging at every thing when they are in the cat bird seat. especially Day one in a niller game with a godfather.
Except that that’s not what I said. You’re missstating my points for your personal gain. Again.
Vote Count with about 1 day, 2 hours and 5 minutes to go
12 Votes required to start Countdown.
(peak vote in Parenthesis)
5 Votes
*Pedescribe (6 #330) ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (86), Tom Scud (282 334), Freudian Slit (288), peekercpa (308), Mental Guy (318), GuiriEnEspaña
2 Votes
Freduian Slit (2 #298) Zeriel (230), Drain Bead (298)
peekercpa (2 #326) pedescribe (307), DiggitCamara (326)
Rin Twisted (2 #358) storyteller0910 (290) ToeJam (358)
1 Vote
amrussell (2 #218) Pedescribe (208 235), Rin Twisted (218), ToeJam (272 320)
Mahaloth (1 #135) peekercpa (135 308) Tom Scud (334)
ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (1 #315) Red Skeezix (315)
*Lynch Leader
Not Voting: Mahaloth, Nanook, USCDiver, Ichini Sanshigo, MHaye, amrussel
What’s kinda ironic is that this is the main reason why I’m voting for Freudian.
one does not equal two. “it will be as hard for scum to piece together” or "they would have more information.
you’re full of shit.
and the fact that you keep hanging on means we’ve got one in the boat.
liar.
lynch all liars on principle. see my previous post.
and the only personal gain that i have is making sure that town wins.
so do you now say (especially since i have figured out the multi quote as opposed to cut and past) that what you said is not what you said? they are direct quotes.
Yeah, I haven’t been posting enough, I know. I’m busy and that’s how it is.
I’ve been following along, but I just don’t have a lot to say. It’s nearly all just random finger pointing on Day One. Most likely, no one who is scum is playing in any clearly different way than they would be if they were vanilla.
Anyway, Tom, you did read my response to peeker regarding my question about role blockers. I was just asking because of the Wild West game. Anyway, I guess you are voting to lynch me as a somewhat lurker, which is…whatever. I admit I haven’t been the “active poster” I usually am in games. At least you have a reason, which I can live with.
I was ready to vote for amrussell yesterday(I think), but I really believe his explanation. This left me with little to go for.
In the end, I have to go with what I think is the closest to a slip or tell. I think peeker, whom I rarely agree with, is quite right that ped is at best, trying to back out of his earlier statement about the scum information. I’m hoping we are right about this one. I’ve never had or seen success on a Day One lynch.
vote pedescribe
By the way, I swear I’ve seen some of you call me “she”. I’m a dude…100%. 
Ugh, I hate Day 1! I’ve been following along and I’ve made posts when I have something to say. I’m not the kind of player who is going to post a hundred times a day. I never have been. When I think that someone is scummy I make a vote. I’m also not going to throw out a dozen votes every day to see what shakes loose. I’m not that kind of player either.
So you are saying a post that essentially said (and no, this is obviously not a direct quote, so don’t come after me for misquoting someone) “this is a very basic game with everything spelled out clearly by the mod, so any discussion of exotic roles such as miller should get the player bringing it up lynched” is a way of baiting someone into talking about millers?
If anything it is stifling discussion, but in this case discussion that I agree should be stifled.
Just as an aside, this is what annoys me about peeker. He plays such that he practically requires an interpreter. I know he is capable of posting much more lucidly, but he seems to only do that when he is scum. I do think, though, that sometimes scum can hide behind an excuse of “I was just confused by what he was saying”. Not that I necessarily think that is the case with Freudian, but with peeker you always have to keep it as a possibility.
It is when you yell at the first person to respond to the post!
:kneads brow:
Every single game, it seems like! Have I not been in hot water day one?! Ever?!
Whatever. Since there’s only, like, a day left in the Day, I’m coming out now.
I’m the vigilante.
Vote Count with about 20 hours and 50 minutes to go
12 Votes required to start Countdown.
(peak vote in Parentheses)
6 Votes
*Pedescribe (6 #330) ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (86), Tom Scud (282 334), Freudian Slit (288), peekercpa (308), Mental Guy (318), GuiriEnEspaña (330), Mahaloth (370)
2 Votes
Freduian Slit (2 #298) Zeriel (230), Drain Bead (298)
peekercpa (2 #326) pedescribe (307), DiggitCamara (326)
Rin Twisted (2 #358) storyteller0910 (290) ToeJam (358)
1 Vote
amrussell (2 #218) Pedescribe (208 235), Rin Twisted (218), ToeJam (272 320)
Mahaloth (1 #135) peekercpa (135 308) Tom Scud (334)
ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (1 #315) Red Skeezix (315)
*Lynch Leader
Not Voting: Nanook, USCDiver, Ichini Sanshigo, MHaye, amrussel
Wow, you’re on the hot spot, about to die, and conveniently you have a power role! How awesome for you.
Unvote pedescribe
I am going to have to think about this more.
Assuming your claim is true, thanks for not doing this at the last minute.
I take it that this means that you have no intention of pulling your vote off of pede, despite the simple fact that if he’s lying the real vig knows it and will presumably take care of it. Makes a good night 1 kill for a vig if he’s lying.
I think that play is scummy.
unvote ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies
vote Freudian Slit
I’m still thinking about it. But it’s such a cliche. Person is about to die, they pull out a power role, and most of the time they’re lying. What are the odds we actually are about to lynch the vig?
It’s also relatively true that “letting the vig handle it” is the right way to deal with a potentially false vig claim.