Unless they’re looking for an off ramp that gives them deniability.
Impeachment is an active process where they would have to go against the leader of their own party. But, compel his testimony under the premise that “Hey, he has nothing to hide, so let’s get it all out there.” And, then pretend to be surprised when it turns out to be the nail in his coffin.
It looks like it varies from committee to committee in both the House and Senate. House committees seem more likely to have delegated subpoena power to the chairperson alone while Senate committees seem more likely to have given the power to the chairperson and ranking minority member of the committee when acting together.
The latter is the arrangement that is in effect for the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Does he even still have lawyers?
He has one: Marc Kasowitz. As of 11:22 am CDT. But the day is young.
Does it even matter if Trump testifies to congress under oath and commits perjury? Sessions did, and he’s not wearing a prison jumper. I can’t see the DOJ indicting a sitting president, and I can’t see Trump ever getting impeached or removed whatever he does.
I agree.
I’ve started wondering if there are any penalties at all for playing Shenanigans with congressional hearings. Seems like you can lie or obfuscate to your heart’s content or even not show up if you feel like it.
That’s a pretty damning analysis; I’d like to know how much concurrence there is amongst law-talking types about this.
Apparently,he has been under oath. And he had to acknowledge that he had lied.
Emphasis added. That’s debatable, not an established fact. And if he did, he may still be liable.
Yes, I’ve seen no analysis that says Sessions is in the clear about his alleged perjury; on the contrary, during Comey’s testimony we heard strong indications that Mueller is looking at Sessions, at Sessions’ meetings with Russia, and at what Sessions has said–or failed to say–about them under oath:
The fact that the four intelligence/Justice officials (Coats, Rogers, McCabe, and Rosenstein) called to the June 7 Senate Intelligence Committee hearing all stonewalled instead of answering questions they had no good reason to refuse, will not have gone unnoticed in the Capitol.
Senators and Representatives are going to want to mark their territory about this issue of letting your Feelings decide whether or not you want to answer questions. We could be seeing the results soon.
I get the need to protect particular agents or methods of information gathering, but are we ever gong to find out the stuff behind the closed doors meeting?
They complain about the media and the public speculating, and being ignorant of the facts, but they hide those facts from us.
Yes, in fairness they should stop complaining about the speculating going on. (They’re not going to stop being secretive–both for good reasons and for ‘humans in positions of power don’t actually like oversight’ reasons.)
As one guy said being interviewed about this whole thing: Once the FBI is involved, all bets are off. I expect they are going to dig and dig and dig and when you start uncovering rocks owned by rich and powerful people, you will almost certainly find some bad shit. Someone is going to trip and “make false statements”, if they haven’t already done so, or end up being found to have “conspired”. I’ll be surprised if this takes down Trump, but some one or some people are going down. Not anytime soon, but maybe next year.
Yup. Eric Holder got held in contempt of Congress, but AFAIK, there were no actual consequences to show for it.
Politico: Holder held in contempt
Wired: Holder Held in Contempt of Congress, Which Means Almost Nothing
Harriet Miers likewise got held in Contempt of Congress, as did White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolton. And Janet Reno before them.
Dick Cheney, however, outright refused to comply with Congressional subpoenas and absolutely diddlysquat happened to him.
Worth noting as a general matter, that it’s true there are no consequences for contempt of congress if it’s a partisan matter and the guy being held in contempt is of the same party which controls the DOJ. So they just won’t prosecute their guy. That doesn’t mean that contempt of congress has no consequences in general.
What are some of the consequences or potential consequences?