To be fair, Sea Sorbust did drop the whole “build observation stations on Mars” stuff after his first thread, where people explained to him about how unnecessary it was. So while he may be a tad overly concerned about asteroid strikes, he’s not totally devoid of reason.
Not really. This is the same guy who was convinced that the British SAS assassinated American generals during WWII, and that the President has no right to appoint cabinet officers (because there’s no “cabinet” mentioned in the Constitution, you see.)
Esti:
You apparently hold to three conspiracy theories: (1) that the US did something to cause the attacks on September 11, 2002, (2) that the citizens of the United States do not question the actions of their government, & (3) that the US carried out a terroristic attack on Japan in 1945.
You, yourself, may consider all war to be terrorism. That does not mean it is.
Your country’s government (depending on the government of the day) may, or may not, be a joke [you yourself postulated that your country’s government launched a war they knew they could not win, all in the name of “forcing negotiation”]; that certainly does not mean other countries’ governments are jokes. It assuredly does not mean the government of the US is a joke.
The atomic attacks on Japan may not have been the wisest military option; however, they were, and remain, military actions–not terrorism.
A word of advice for you: If you can’t hang in English, quit fucking trying!
As for this:
You worthless, shitty, snot-nosed, “student” of likely some non-qualified, laughably inadequate institution; you do not know, nor do you seem able to learn, what someone learns in the Navy. Your country’s Navy very well may be made up of masturbatory fools such as you; ours, on the other hand, is staffed by men and women qualified to do their jobs. Since we haven’t launched any wars knowing we’d lose them, I’d say our Navy is a blame sight less blind (and, presumably, less masturbatory, than that joke of all jokes, the Argentine Canoe Club).
Go to hell, jerk.
My thoughts exactly.
I truly believe that entire planet is involved in a massive conspiracy to piss me off and make me look foolish.
That ought to get me an honorable mention, at least.
Estilicon
We have been through the issues of the Falkand Islands before and your calim is based solely upon rolling back history to a convenient time in the late 18th century.
Fortunately few governments use this kind of diplomacy seriously, since if we did, Agentina itself would not exist, nor would Italy, Germany, none of the constituent parts of what was Yugoslavia, the list is almost endless.
As a matter of fact one can see directly what the results are of winding back history to a point in time that suits one particular party when one looks at the middle East, and it amply demonstrates why this is - A Bad Idea.
You will only get the Falkands in Agentinian posession when you can demonstrate to the inabitants thereof that it is to their benefit(they will be the ones to decide) , and your history of military Juntas, and financial vulnerability means that day is a long way off.
I also think that bringing this issue up is nothing to do with the OP at all.
Monty no one can reason with you, I apologized for the phrase “had it coming” which is strikingly similar to the spanish “Se la veian venir”, unfortunately they don’t mean the same. I apologized twice for my mistake, I try to reason with you three times and yet you still repeat the same thing over and over again. Moving to another subject I am shock to discover that the U.S.A navy does not teach their recruits how to masturbate “Navy style”, after all sailors are dumb and they probably can’t figure it out by themselves like normal people… or perhaps those stories about sailors in the sea are true.
Fortunately for you The Glorious Argentinian Navy does. I logged on to www.losmarinerossontodosputos.com.ar and I checked the regulations for you. I’ll paste it in spanish and will translate it free of charge. I am a good boy, and if at your age you don’t know how to “jerk it off” (did i get the slang correctly?) you are probably stupid and therefore broke:
Reglamento para masturbarse en alta mar
(Regulations for masturbating at the sea)
-
El marinero gritara ¡Viva la Patria!
(The sailor has to shout long live the fatherland!) -
Debe pensar en la mujer de Rawson para lograr una ereccion.
(He must think in Admiral Rawson´s wife (Rawson is the founding father of the argentinian navy, think of your’s navy founding father wife) to achieve an erection. -
Los zurdos agarraran el organo sexual con la derecha y viceversa. Moveran luego la mano de abajo para arriba para lograr el orgasmo.
(Then the left handed have to grab their sexual organ with the right, and the right handed with the left (I don’t know why, they are probably as dumb as U.S. sailors) then moving it up and down untill achieving an orgasm -
se limpiaran y gritaran ¡Viva la Patria!
( They will later clean themselves and shout once more Long live the fatherland!
Monty the regulation are made for an Heterosexual if you are not one instead of thinking of the navy’s creator wife, think of him.
I now that when I was a boy (I just turned 22) I masturbated a lot, you are older so be carefull you don’t want to die from a heart attack. In a couple of years you will find a woman (or a sailor) and experience your sexuality at its fullest (beware of heart attacks). I hope that after all the advices I gave you we can now be friends. Before I forget use Viagra
You really are a first class snail-felching prick, you know that?
:rolleyes: :wally
So, anyone know how to use the “ignore” feature I’ve heard about?
Wish I knew, Mac.
Actually, none of the three things you list really (IMHO) qualify as ‘conspiracy’ theory.
-
There were many threads back in October where a significant number of well respected posters suggested that while the US didn’t deserve 9/11, and nothing justified 9/11 attacks, to hold that the US never did nuthin’ to cause folks to be pissed off at them and want to hurt them is, well, naive. You may not agree, not everyone does, but that hardly qualifies it for ‘conspiracy theory’ status, and the scorn you’re heaping here.
-
Some one believing that the citizens of the US don’t question the actions of their government -well, I personally would disagree w/that, but I can see how an outsider might get that impression when they hear stuff like 90% approval rating for GWB or Clinton’s high approval rating. So, again, while we might disagree about the sentiment expressed, it hardly qualifies for a conspiracy theory.
-
Again, the US bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during WWII, can actually be discussed in the same types of terms as a terroristic attack. Again, it is not my claim that it’s the same damn thing, but it certainly has parrallels, and the holding of that belief again doesn’t qualify for conspiracy theory.
Do I recall correctly that you’ve also defended both Masons and Christianity (or is it LDS?) You are aware, of course, that in some people’s view, that ranks you in the category of ‘cultist’ (again, you may not agree w/the terminology or see that it fits, but certainly you should be aware if I’m remembering who you are, you’ve been involved in debates here relative to that position).
In short. While we may have a certain amount of fun w/ a JDT type of guy, and certainly the pit is a home for finger pointing etc. I don’t feel that you’ve done an adequate job here proclaiming a poster holding those opinions as being a ‘conspiracy freak’. They might be, but you’ve not demonstrated it.
And, I see an awful lot of jerkiness in this thread, not just from one side.
Estilicon cannot be labeled a conspiracy theorist based upon your three examples, Monty. And upon scrolling down to capture the examples, I find that wring has beaten me to it.
He does strike me as having a sense of humor (thanks for the Naval regulations and translation, Estilicon, it was very funny), and it seems to me (from what I’ve read in this thread) that he is sincere in his desire to make peace with you. In any event, I don’t see him being deliberately provocative, although perhaps he should get to know his correspondents better before he engages in overly familiar banter.
I don’t want to be sucked into defending another bj0rn here, so I will depart with this: Estilicon, in English, it is indeed, “accusation,” with two c’s; and Monty it is, in fact, “afficionado,” with two f’s.
Actually, I think in October of 1999, the board was still using UBB.
Or am I missing some subtle difference between vB as a type of board software, and UBB as a particular brand of vB software?
Or am I in fact, wrong, and the switch to vB was prior to October, 1999?
Tkanks Kay biy actually aficionado is with only one F.
And, apparently, kaylas, wring & the snail-felcher completely missed this part of my OP:
Basically, it’s obvious that said snail-felcher is a whacko. It is now, citing his “masturbation regulation” posting above, to see he is a prime grade-a jackass.
'preciate the spelling assit, kaylas. You may recall that I appended “(sp?)” after my rendtion of the word.
One guess what that means.
Hey Monty, you can thank me. After all I brought it first to your attention. Aficionado that’s the word. And we prefer our langauge to be called castellano. Thanks in advance.
Damm, language
Don’t be offended I am correcting your castellano. God knows that instead of correcting my mistakes you insult me. Stick with me and you’ll speak it better than Juan Carlos I de Borbon y Borbon
and, you, Monty missed where I fucking quoted your own fucking words “You apparently hold to three conspiracy theories”.
care to try again?
You fucked up. Admit it and move along.
Estilicon, who exactly is the ‘we’ that prefer to call their language castellano? The Argentines? Your Argentine dialect is probably much farther removed from castellano than most others. There are several hundred million hispanohablantes on this planet and more call it Spanish than call it castellano. In fact here is the definition of hispanohablante from the Real Academia Española:
1. adj. Que tiene el español como lengua materna o propia. Apl. a pers., u. t. c. s.
So I guess if it’s good enough for the Academy, it’s good enough for the posters here.
Now as far as calling all sailors stupid. Apparently the ones in your Navy might fit this description seeing as they need a manual to teach them to jack off. That’s something that most good American boys figure out on their own at a much earlier age.
BTW I am impressed by your command of English. You handle the verbs well but you may want to work some on the prepositions! And until Monty (who lists foreign language study as an interest in his profile) can post as articulately in another language he out to back off on criticizing your English.