Could we have some MORE threads about "Survivor"?

Even after every radio show this morning talking about it constantly, and it being front page news on every newspaper and web news site, and there being 14 thousand threads about it here, I STILL don’t know who the winner is.

Please, could more threads be started stating who the winner is? Perhaps when there’s an even million, it might penetrate my steel-like cranium.

Thanks in advance.

Ask and ye shall receive (or something like that).

All I know is, I walked through the living room this morning, and there was Good Morning America on the Tee-Vee and a Survivor logo up there on the screen, and Bonzo sitting on the couch, and I said, “Oh, who won?” and he said, “Red Shirt”, and I said, “Oh,” and life went on.

No, sorry, it can’t be done. Anymore Survivor threads might result in the systematic annhilation of every armadillo and wallaby on earth.

Perhaps if the Survivor team had to indulge in cannibalism to weed out the weaker members and there were perils like sharks, pirhana(sp), and wild boars, the show would at least be entertaining. What would even be better is Jerry Springer and his guests in that mileu.

Hastur wrote:

Perhaps if the Survivor team had to indulge in cannibalism to weed out the weaker members and there were perils like sharks, pirhana(sp), and wild boars, the show would at least be entertaining. What would even be better is Jerry Springer and his guests in that mileu.

How about, for Survivor II, one of the Immunity Competitions is being a referee on Jerry Springer?

Long time, no see, Peter. Glad to see you are still out there.

Kirk

How about those survivor parties people were having last night? Dressed in “survivor gear” and carrying torches around the house. How bored must your life be to attend or worse host one of those?

I am aware of the fact that there was such a show. However, I have managed to live quite happily without seeing a single episode.

So there.

There was? Was it any good?

Hey Lynn—

You’re not alone; I didn’t watch a single episode either! The whole idea sounded incredibly stupid, especially the whole “tribe” concept. And now they’re going to do a “Survivor” 2…

A local TV station aired its 11 o’clock news from the home of a family that was having a “survivor party” to watch the last episode. They looked like idiots screaming at the television after they found out who won.

I only saw one episode, the climactic one. What I couldn’t believe was HOW FUCKING BORING AND ANNOYING IT WAS!!! And this was supposed to be the INTERESTING one.

Too bad they couldn’t have used an island where they still have headhunters.

I think “Survivor II” should feature two dozen of America’s most heinous mass murderers, currently wasting their talents in prison.

Unedited, on pay-per-view.

Now we’re talking survivor.

I am surrounded by Survivor watchers who just can’t believe that I am not as mindless as they are. Nice to meet you all.

Even if I watched the fucking thing, and liked it, and wanted to talk about it on this board, I would still do a cursory check to see if there were already threads about it.

…before starting a new one.

(in case that wasn’t obvious)

The tragic thing is, given the record ratings from the vast, mooing herds of American Cattle who religiously followed the show each week, this thing will take years to die off. At least until some New Sparkly Item catches the attention of the herd.

I agree. That would be an excellent idea for a show. When this happens, though, warn me so I can be about 5000 miles away from there at the time. :smiley:

I dunno- I kinda like “Survivor”. Sure, Eye of the Tiger gets overplayed but its a decent song and…whassthat? They’ve got their own TV show now? And they’re stuck on an island without drugs, hairspray, and groupies? That could be fun to watch…

clapclapclap

I was going to say something like this. I’ll just second your opinion. :slight_smile: