I’m still not sure what the “right way” is, but this has been enlightening (and entertaining) nevertheless. Thank you all.
This is exactly why I own v-neck undershirts to wear under dress shirts.
If that works for you, fine. I almost always wear an undershirt under a dress shirt, because if it’s cool, it helps keep me from feeling cold; and if it’s warm, it helps keep me from sweating through my shirt.
I tend to run hot but I don’t sweat, which is a bad combination. If I’m wearing a suit jacket it’s even worse. I would claw my way out of three layers of clothing.
All of my t-shirt undershirts are v-necks. I just prefer the feel of the neckline.
And I always wear a tee under a dress shirt. If I don’t, over time they develop pit stains.
Pit stains are my main reason but also they are good soaking up any sweat before it shows through the main shirt (pit sweats but also torso sweat). Can depend a lot on the weather/conditions of course but, for me at least, just a good habit to wear an undershirt…just in case.
I rarely have multiple buttons unbuttoned like the guy in picture #1. The guy in picture #2 looks dorky. I never wear see-through dress shirts like the guys in pictures #3 and #4 (who look dorky because you can see the short sleeves through the shirt).
My main problem with crew-neck shirts under a button-up shirt is when the crew-neck collar starts to get frayed. With a v-neck you never see it, frayed or not.
True but they seem good for a year at least (more for me…probably two years) and they are cheap so a new bunch is not a big deal to buy. Frankly, they lose that pristine white before they fray too much for me.
ETA: Yeah, guy #2 would be better losing that sport coat.
My undershirts are either white or black. So I can come close to the color of my shirt. All are crew necks.
V neck undershirts and sweaters and sweater vests are simply dorky. But if they work for you then that’s cool, knock yerseff out.
I hate t-shirts. I had to wear them in the military, along with hats (which I also dislike), and I haven’t worn either since retiring. My stepfather always wore wife-beaters (strappy Ts), which is an odd choice.
Yeah, basically a tank top which to me makes no sense to wear as an undershirt. As others mentioned, the most important purpose for an undershirt when worn beneath a dress shirt is to absorb armpit sweat so it’s not visible on the outer shirt and doesn’t ruin it.
Really.
Except for the fact it’s a color photo, not B&W, #1 could easily be my Dad in 1955 a couple years before I was born. Totally antique bad look.
#2 with the sport coat is not much different except the coat is a really rumpled mess in a bad color and needs to go.
As said by others, #3 & 4 suffer from seeing the undershirt printing through. Don’t do that. If #4 had a crewneck with an equally wide collar it’s be equally ugly holding up his Adam’s apple.
Being female, I don’t have a dog in this fight, but this makes me wonder why they don’t make shirts that are like regular T-shirts, but simply without the sleeves.
They wouldn’t do as good a job at absorbing underarm sweat, but the fabric cutoff would be the same place as the outer shirt’s shoulder seams, so there wouldn’t be that jarring visible cutoff mid-arm.
Like this?
If you want to get the armpits covered there needs to be some sleeve.
Otherwise it is a tank-top (aka wife-beater).
They do. 'Sleeveless’ T-shirts are mostly made that way, not in the tank-top or ‘wife-beater’ style. I’ve had versions from common brands like Hanes that appear to be the same as their ordinary crew neck T without the sleeves sewn on.
OK, differentiation here:
There’s the undershirt which as mentioned is worn basically to protect the skin and the proper clothing from one another, but is not part of the outfit.
And then there’s a T-shirt which is an actual part of an outfit. The latter case of course the point is that it will be visible. (* see at the end).
The former seems to be what we really are speaking of? In which case my experiences are: Most of my regular “casual dress” shirts, and my dress shirts when worn in casual mode, are worn with the collar button undone, but with the regular buttons closed. So a moderate V is satisfactory as its edge stays just below the topmost button. Also my preferred shirt cut and fabric frees me from the “printing” problem in almost all cases. A full crew is something I wear when I have a dress occasion where I’ll have a coat-and-tie on all the way through the event, with a white shirt.
A lot of the issues do have to do with fit, too, which tends to be different between dedicated undershirts and “activewear” T-shirts of the same putative label “size” and then between brands and even lines in a same brand. One thing I have encountered in the case of undershirts has been the wide variance of the cut of the V-neck, with some so shallow it’s almost like a wide crewneck but with a folded angle that merely signals which way is front.
(* ) so for instance when I am using a T-shirt-as-outfit-layer, say an unbuttoned camp shirt over a colored T-shirt in summer, or during “shoulder season” where in the warmest part of the day I go T-shirt only but, in the morning, or early evening, I would throw a shirt on.
I’ll defend the A-shirt (or what some call “wifebeater”). I’ve never worn any other kind of undershirt with a jacket and tie, or even without a tie/tie loosened. Perhaps in high school, maybe. But it would never occur to me to wear a thicker cotton T-shirt/crew-neck which is destined to become soaked with sweat, and therefore, heavy and uncomfortable if it is a day where some small exertion is required.
Pit sweat is not a problem for me (antiperspirant seems to help), whereas copious amounts of sweat all over the torso and back can be a major problem at times. The A-shirt balances protecting the outer shirt with avoiding the additional bulk or heft of other styles.
Antiperspirant helps a lot but it ruins your shirts in the armpit area over time.
I’ve heard that.
Actually, I never wear white dress shirts anymore.
Strictly black A-shirts underneath black dress shirts, and an appropriate tie.
The “look” fits in at all sorts of places.