Thought this should go here and not Great Debates, but mods, move it if you like.
Warning: Spoilers!
I saw a local production of Damn Yankees a few weeks ago, and last night saw the 1958 film. It occurred to me, both times, that Joe Boyd - the old schlub who makes a deal with the Devil, er, Mr. Applegate to play for the Washington Senators baseball team - is still in trouble at the end of the show.
In the original play and movie, Applegate and Boyd had a simple oral contract:
- Applegate would make Boyd a great baseball player
- If so, Boyd would give Applegate his soul
- Boyd insisted on, and Applegate reluctantly granted, an escape clause which had to be exercised by a particular date and time
Applegate kept his end of the deal, making Boyd much younger and stronger; he became a great baseball player and, as “Joe Hardy,” led the Senators to a pennant win, defeating the, ahem, damn Yankees. Boyd did not avail himself of the escape clause in time. Applegate transformed “Hardy” back into Boyd at the very end of the big game, but Boyd was still able to make the winning catch. Boyd then ran home to embrace his long-suffering wife, and rebuffed a furious Applegate.
It seems to me that Applegate can still claim Boyd’s soul. Boyd had a winning season as a great baseball player, as promised, and didn’t use the escape clause. Applegate’s changing of “Hardy” back to Boyd during the last game is irrelevant - Applegate never promised Boyd that he’d play in the World Series, or even beyond that season - but even if it weren’t, Applegate could change him back into Hardy in the twinkling of an eye, any time before Hardy/Boyd died a natural death.
The movie ends with Applegate angry and frustrated, but I don’t know why. Looks like he’s still going to get what he bargained for - Joe’s immortal soul.
So in Applegate v. Boyd, who wins?