So on Saturday Night Live this past week, Pete Davidson described Dan Crenshaw, a candidate for the US House in the Houston area as looking like a “hitman in a porno movie”
Thing is, Crenshaw lost his eye as a SEAL in Afghanistan.
So as you might imagine, the usual suspects have their panties in a massive twist about it, claiming that Davidson is making fun of his injury, and isn’t respecting veterans and all sorts of other stuff.
Never mind that Crenshaw has literally plastered his eyepatched face all over his campaign stuff - making it part of his visual brand, so to speak. The only way he could have made it more so is if his logo was literally a stylized eyepatch or something. I kind of figure that if he does that, he’s opening himself up for whatever ridicule he gets. Had he not made it part of his campaign, I’d probably feel differently.
I’m not a fan of Pete Davidson; he’s about the weakest link on today’s SNL, but this joke made me laugh out loud- Crenshaw DOES look like what a hitman in a porno would look like.
Am I off base here? Is there more to it that I’m missing? Am I just insensitive and disrespectful?