Bizzarro mafia indeed! If your assumption of 3 scum is correct, we would lose on N2, NOT lylo on D3. This was already explained in post #78, and you seemed to acknowledge (reluctantly) that you understood the math in post #80.
I think you’re playing coy. You know exactly what I’m trying to explain here, and you understood it when I said it back on page 2. But, you know if you can keep the discussion on this stupid minutiae about whether there’s really 2 or 3 scum, and whether a no lynch buys us an extra night or not, then nobody will be talking about how you’re deliberately misrepresenting everything I’m posting. For example, I never suggested we no-lynch on day 1! Yet this is the third or fourth post where you claim I did.
For the record, 2 scum is lylo on day 3, not day 4. Once again, this is math that had been explained to you before, and you even acknowledged is correct. The only reason to keep bringing it up is distraction.
Nope, I’m seriously hoping for a lynch today.
No, I’m not. I said you’re insisting there are 3 scum, and yet acting in the way that is mathematically worst for town in that scenario. It’s very important that the two clauses I presented are brought together, and not argued as if I never said the second part.
Not your play style, perhaps. I never thought there were 3 scum, but nice job keeping the discussion on this topic. Maybe we can keep talking about it all the way through day 2, and nobody will notice that you’re stalling.
No I didn’t. I accused you of pointing suspicion without actually owning what you were saying. Almost every post in which you cast suspicion, you follow with something distancing yourself from that position. The important thing you should have quoted from me is that you don’t want any blood on your hands, Instead of yet again only quoting one part of a two part clause I wrote.
No I didn’t. I’m getting tired of pointing out all the deceit in your misrepresentations of what I said. I said “oh, you weren’t serious” in response to your suggestion that we lynch one of the people who didn’t vote for me. It was a joke.
Why are you spending so much time arguing against a position I never held? I never campaigned for a no-lynch day 1. All I did was point out to you that it was the best option if you were right about the scum ratio, which I believed was NOT the case.
No, I didn’t. I described “if you flip town after a lynch/night kill, we can consider where that leaves HookerChemical” as weasel words. What exactly do you mean by “we can consider where that leaves him”? There’s no reasonable argument against HC being town in this scenario, yet you seem to want to leave the door open for the possibility of doubt. That’s weasel words.
WF Tomba thinks it’s obvious, but (s)he’s wrong. I explained why I wrote what I wrote, and it’s not because of a power role.
Hooker Chemical is town. I know this because he switched his vote when he didn’t have to. This would be an obvious conclusion for me to draw as a vanilla townie. I don’t have a power role, and I never claimed one.