Yo, Scammy, you’ve started 18 threads since yesterday. That’s way too many in such a short time. Stop it.
But he’s so full of interesting questions and ideas!
He’s full of something, all right.
We already have one ralph12c. I guess we’re stuck with another.
No it wasn’t. Read the first post again.
But that’s true. Grand Prix races are better than NASCAR races 
Go back to sleep too, obese capitalistic cultureless ethnomasochist.
Wow. If you read that in a Daffy Duck voice you have to wipe down the monitor.
If scamartistry followed his theory to it’s conclusion he’d have to agree that South American natives are the worlds Übermensch. If he is anything other, he’s genetically inferior.
“Shrewd” means “keen and insightful.” Believe me when I say that nobody has mistaken your OP for being shrewd.
I don’t know if you meant to be more nuanced but there are very reputable and expensive studies going on to this day that map human migration patterns and how that affects the the population genome to this day. You obviously haven’t even looked at the National Geographic Project I referenced. It is ongoing and you can even take part in yourself quite easily with a mouth swab DNA sample that gives you a rough breakdown of your genetic ancestry. It won’t tell you who your grandparents are but it will tell you which human populations you are derived from and contribute to the overall database. There are many distinct genetic human lineages but also lots of crossbreeding and overlap.
https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/index.html
The people that say that niggers from Africa can run real quick and are all good at sports are obviously idiots because Africa has the highest rate of genetic diversity on earth. They aren’t very related populations at all. However, if you flip the equation around, the general point about human differences being much more than skin deep is very real. Only a limited number of populations left Africa in the first place and they produced various founder effects along the way. That could be anything from stocky Scandinavians to epithelial eye folds in Asians. Those populations are fairly closely related and the time-span is only tens of thousands to a few thousand years as opposed to Africa where people differentiated and remained segregated since modern humans evolved. Neanderthals probably interbred with modern humans as well in Europe and that accelerated the rate of human genetic differentiation there.
This subject should be completely intuitive and non-shocking but it isn’t for some people because it has been a verbatim subject since the 1960’s. There is a bunch of research on it but people still stonewall and bristle at the thought.
Genographic, not Geographic. I sent in my swab several years ago. Pretty much told what I expected, though.
There is definitely some research being done trying to understand cognitive differences between certain populations, even some looking at evolution having occurred in historical times. Very preliminary, though, and not at all a consensus having been formed.
You posting drunk?
You ass. Mod power is not an argumentative cudgel.
No, I don’t drink. Everything I wrote was based on recent and credible research. What part didn’t make sense or do you want me to expand upon?
Do you mean verboten? Because verbatim makes no sense here.
Regardless, people don’t bristle and stonewall at the idea of genetic differentiation, they react to the idea that differentiation necessarily results in the superiority of one race over another. The existence of things like the National Genographic Project, a well funded and publicized study, show that the topic is hardly forbidden. What is frowned upon is interpreting the results of those studies to show that certain races are just ‘better’ than others. I don’t know of any serious scientists who deny that there are genetic differences between the human races.
The problem with people like the OP is that they hold the common misconception that selection pressure results in the creation of an idealized form over time, and that therefore Caucasians are ‘more evolved’ than other races. The problem is that there is no such thing as ‘more evolved’ - the process of evolution by natural selection does not drive a species towards a single idealized form, it just equips it for life in whatever habitat it happens to be in at this time. Anyone who has studied any kind of genetics should know that adaptive divergence over space and time tells us nothing about the relative worth of different groups, it just tells us about the ability of subgroups to deal with the environment that they live in.
Epicanthic. Those occur in Africans too, BTW, not that that negates what you said, I know.
Wait, is this saying various African populations didn’t interbreed? Because that would be provably wrong.
As an Asian, I endorse this retarded theory.
How do Tasmanians figure into this theory, isolated as they were for some 10,000 years?
Well, they’re awfully patient.