A friend of mine nannies one of the cutest kids ever. He told her about his trip to see the Space Shuttle Endeavor. He said, You have to see it! It has a ‘carry on’!"
She didn’t understand, but he couldn’t say it any differently (He’s adorable and three).
So what part of a space shuttle would have a “carry on”?? HELP!
Perhaps he was referring to the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, the 747 that carried the shuttle on its back? I can see how that could be pretty cool to a kid.
Elder siblings and cousins acting as interpreters (the youngers of any given bunch of kids tend to develop “understandable language” later than the olders, because the younger ones take advantage of the built-in interpreters), and memories of doing so (learning to decipher one toddler’s broken grammar is hard; doing it for toddler number 25 is automatic). Were you older within your family/neighborhood group, if you had one?
Indeed there are. When my son was little, I was opposed to letting him watch television (at least before the point where it became Inevitable) – but we did have a VCR. Because we didn’t have much money, we only had two movies: “Yellow Submarine” and “The Empire Strikes Back.”
So when he persistently called an elevator a “darth vator,” I knew what he meant.
I would ask the kid to draw a picture of the carry-on. Of course, depending on the kid’s art skills, that might just raise even more questions than it answers. “What’s that thing over there that looks like a six-legged horse?” “That’s you, Mommy!” “Oh, very good, it looks just like me!”
I have two kids, the youngest is 1. She’s just starting to have any kind of meaningful verbal communication. Sometimes we just can’t figure out what she’s saying. Other times it’s clear. And then there are times when we can figure it out in context, such as when she kept asking for “muggy” for weeks, and finally combined the word with pointing to a bottle of milk."
As kids get older they forget these early struggles with language. My mother insists I used to call a fire engine a “woot” and referred to Batman as “at-bat” but I have no recollection of any of this.
I also vote for “Canadarm,” as I’m sure even if it’s not deployed on the actual exhibit, there are pictures or videos of it in operation somewhere in the museum. Maybe even a separate spot with a model or replica just of that piece on display (no idea, never been). The robot arm would be something probably pretty cool to a 3 year old, and the word kinda fits.