At some point he might realize that it’s easier to just not come to this site than to put everyone who says disparaging things about his thought processes on Ignore.
No, you’re paranoid, arrogant and stupid. That makes me *seem *like a stalker to you. Do try to keep up.
You’re ignoring me because you’re a coward who can’t support his delusions, yet wants other people to believe them. I can see why I’d be annoying to such a person.
Just so you’re aware, you probably aren’t fooling anyone.
No need to transmit this to him, this is as much for the peanut gallery as mswas.
Not at all. I still won’t let your lies go unaddressed. Just because you’re running like a coward doesn’t mean you get a free pass to post ignorant tripe, does it?
I’m not the one trolling. If you’ll notice this thread references me. I asked for the previous thread to be closed. Someone else reopened the discussion. I am the one being trolled, not the other way around. If someone is going to troll me, then I am going to respond. It’s what they want, and I’ll feed them, but I won’t feed them what they ask for, I’ll make sure what I feed them is not what they are looking for.
I didn’t ask for Bryan Ekers to hatecrush me by starting a Pit thread.
shrugs I view pitting me as throwing me a party. It’s a testament to my ego. Why should I view it as anything else? Why should I take it seriously when someone starts a thread just to trash me?
You’ll notice that they are a lot more into me than I am into them. I don’t start pit threads dedicated to them. In fact I generally don’t pit people. I think I’ve done it once or twice.
Having checked the two threads*, the answer is between a low of one and a high of six, depending on how stringently you define the ‘actually thought’ part.
The definitely thought you were serious one would be Michael Ellis in posts #32 & 36 of this thread.
More borderline cases would be:
-E-Sabbath (post #19 of the original thread), who asks mswas “Is there something wrong with you” albeit without saying whether s/he thought the OP was meant seriously
-Mr. Krebbs (#50), who refers to “the stupidity of comparing Obama to Hitler” but does not state if he believes if mswas was making a serious comparison or not.
-twickster (#22), El_Kabong (#23) and Plain Jane (#41) who all express some variant of ‘is the OP serious or not?’
*I am aware I could use a life, thanks.
You know considering how much you complain about being stalked and persecupted you don’t seem too broken up about it. In fact if I didn’t know better I’d almost think you enjoy it.
Yes and no. I’d be content to be left alone, but if I am to be harassed I’ll play the game of the harasser. In Great Debates it’s fucking annoying in the Pit meh.
Basically the game is trying to shame me into shutting up. It’s irrelevant what I say as long as I don’t shut up. If I shut up the terrorists have won.
I was curious if he was posting drunk, stoned, or seriously ill. It… well, it didn’t really seem to be a coherent set of sentences. It appeared to be the setup of some kind of shaggy dog story, but it wasn’t long enough, and there wasn’t a punchline. It struck me as the kind of thing someone in an altered state of mind would think was incredibly funny, and nobody else would ‘get’, as there’s nothing there to get.
Oh, I’m not talking about that joke thread (though I stand by my statement in the thread that it wasn’t funny), and I’m not talking about this thread (a pitting is a party! Mijin has been throwing me one, the poor, poor fool). I’m talking about the multiple occasions where you have deflected rational criticisms of your arguments in GD by claiming that your opponents have cognition problems, when it’s perfectly clear that yes, they do understand you, and that the real problem you have is that you can’t counter their rebuttals of your statements.
It’s a chickenshit ad-hominem, is what it is, and you have resorted to it several times, both against me and against others. And I HATE it. That said, you certainly don’t default to that position, and you’re not doing it here and now. It’s just something you do sometimes when the alternative would be conceding a point that you’re unwilling to ‘lose’.
I disagree that they do understand me, and in many of those cases I have had it corroborated by other posters that indeed I am being misunderstood. That’s the thing if I didn’t get confirmation that some people understand me and others don’t then I would assume that I am mistaken. I know it may not seem obvious to you, but I generally assume that the mistake is on my part if I am being misunderstood by EVERYONE involved.
No, sometimes people legitimately do not understand what is being said. It happens ALL the time. There are plenty of times when I concede a point after being schooled. You just don’t notice them because it’s one post and then I stop arguing. Is it so hard for you to believe that I honestly think I am being misunderstood?
