Did you guys know that Evil Captor likes bondage? With bonus fuck-off for Miller!

I have no protest about the closing of the other thread - we all know the rules about bringing business from other boards over here. That said, inkleberry posted something I’ve been thinking about posting for a long time.

Evil Captor, I too am not amused by the constant references to bondage. It seems like virtually every thread you post references your interest in it. Hell, even your screen name does. It’s fine to be into whatever you like - bondage, S&M, whatever, it’s all cool as long as it’s Safe, Sane, and Consentual.

But I don’t appreciate hearing references to it in every thread. I don’t know why you do this - do you get off to the idea that you’re making other people uncomfortable? Or are you not a BDSM afficionado so much as a creepy pervert with a one-track mind? Let’s face it, BDSM is an unconventional interest, which doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with it, but that the subject matter makes certain people uncomfortable for their own reasons. Which you know. Further, constant references to sex would unpleasant even if it were the plain ol’ vanilla variety.

It’s clear that many of the threads you post, you’re not looking for real information. Let’s face it - the web is not exactly conducive to shyness about one’s sexual interests. There are a wealth of boards dedicated to people with various unusual or obscure special interests, and you could go there if you were really looking for subject matter expertise. The SDMB is a fine general purpose board, but just as I wouldn’t use it to find serious linguistic information or references on the lingering influence of Le Corbusier’s Ville Radieuse on modern city planning, you’re not going to find specific information on bondage here. If you want specific questions answered, I’m sure you know where to look. Since you seem to enjoy just chit-chatting about bondage so damn much, you know where there are more appropriate places for that too. Stop fucking trying to constantly drag the rest of us into your jerk-off fantasies.

I’m just creeped out by your obvious and exhibitionistic need to bring bondage up at completely inappropriate times. Develop some hobbies that don’t involve women being tied up, for Christ’s sake.

And Miller, fuck you for trying to turn this into an issue of sexual minorities versus majorities. The nature of Evil Captor’s sexual interest is neither here nor there, so long as it’s not his only fucking topic of conversation. A fair enough comparison would be if you or I decided to use the screen name “ILuvItUpTheButt” and start threads about how The Talented Mr. Ripley would have been way better if we’d seen Matt Damon giving Jude Law a rimjob. Do not cheapen the struggle for gay rights by drawing inapt comparisons to this. The things gay people are fighting for are things like the right not to be fired from your job for being gay, or the right to inheritance when your partner dies, or the right to make medical decisions on your partner’s behalf. A crusade for mainstream acceptance of BDSM is not even remotely comparable, because it’s an explicitly sexual matter - it doesn’t extend out of the bedroom, and BDSM enthusiasts don’t face remotely the same discrimination that gay people do.

Fuck you. Fuck you for cheapening the very real and important matter of gay rights by comparing it to some pervert’s desire to talk about sex in completely inappropriate circumstances. The fetishistic nature of his sex life is not even relevant to the issue, so fuck you for suggesting that those of us who don’t enjoy Evil Captor’s litany of references to rape porn are prejudiced against BDSM. It wouldn’t be appropriate for anyone to explicitly and constantly discuss sex acts here, and Evil Captor the Exhibitionist Bondage Freak is no exception.

So… he’s like a one-trick ponygirl?

:smiley:

Doing a bad movie style slow clap…That was brilliant.

Man, all these years I’ve been posting here, I finally get pitted… and I can’t really say the OP doesn’t have a point. Man, that’s disappointing. I’d always hoped that my first pitting would be a vicious, multi-page affair that would result in multiple bannings and a change in board policy. Anyway, I had a long day yesterday, was frustrated by the GD thread, and posted more out of emotion than rationalism. I still think inkleberry, and you, are being a pair of whiny bitches about this in general, but the parrallel I created was inappropriate. My apologies.

Hey could someone have the screenname “RapeYouLikeABitch”? I hope not. Just like I wish I didn’t have to have my day ruined by the images conjured up by EC. I mean fuck who wants to think of Dahmer or NG or Gacy when chatting with friends? Those fuckers were Evil Captors. Sexual fantasies fine but EVIL sexual fantasies? Props to Excalibre for saying what I wished I had said.

Population of Internet Messageboard is Whiny, Insecure, and Intolerant of Others; Film at 11. In other news, Pope’s hat found to be ‘funny’.

I’ve gotta say that until this thread turned up (and the other one, which, IMO was rightly closed), I’d never noticed anything unusual or obsessive in E_C’s posts. Granted, I guess I haven’t bothered to open bondage-related threads, mostly because I’m not into that sort of thing. It certainly doesn’t bother me overmuch. Consenting adults and all that.

Now, I have looked at the list in the closed thread, and it seems that only some of the listed items actually refer specifically to bondage, so for me the argument here is pretty weak.

Anyway, do tell us just how many bondage-related threads each poster is allowed, in your view, just in case one day I decide to adopt that particular kink.

Nitpick.
*
Consensual.*

/Nitpick

:smiley:
Just trying to lighten the mood.

The only time I noticed Evil Captor’s username is when he was arguing against torture, and hence I found the name ironic.

I’m not a Pit Moderator, but it could be some time before anyone gets here.

Flaming other members is one thing.

Pulling in fights from other boards is something else. We do not permit this.

And orchestrated campaigns against a member are something else again. We do not permit this, either. If you have a complaint against a member’s specific post, use the REPORT BAD POST button (little exclamation point in the red triangle in the upper right corner of each post.) Let the Moderators decide.

If you have a complaint against a member per se, then ditto.

And no, “RapeYouLikeaBitch” wouldn’t be allowed. Screen names are monitored. Granted, they’re not monitored up front – trying to program in every possible offensive name would be ridiculous, and holding up registration until an Administrator can OK a name would also be ridiculous. So they’re usually monitored after registration: we see someone posting with a name that is not reasonable, and then we nicely ask them to pick a less offensive screen name.

I missed the other thread, but I’ve read hundreds of Evil Captor’s posts without having a clue to his particular sexual preferences.

Of course, I didn’t realize until earlier this year that Miller is gay and his SO also posts here. And I’ve read thousands of his posts over the years. So maybe I’m a bit too oblivious to be a good data point here.

Miller, I don’t think your analogy was flawed, because in the past “Exhibitionist Bondage Freak” could just as easily have been “Faggot Sicko”, and people would have been horrified at disgusting homos talking about their dirty sex and stuff.

He has an interest in BDSM, and posts occasionally on that topic, along with a ton of posts on other topics like politics. Actually, I always remember him from those discussions, not anything sexual. Yeah, maybe he’d get some better info at Bondage dot com, but we are free here to post about most any legal thing we want. Not to mention that 20 sex threads over 3 years isn’t exactly approaching one trick pony territory.

If he’s hijacking threads with his bondage talk, I could see slamming him for that. But pitting him for starting clearly marked threads that you find offensive is just nonsense.

I understand both those things, and as I stated in the OP, I only posted this because I’ve happened to think the same thing for a long time and I was disappointed to see inkleberry’s thread closed. The fact that two people happen to agree on something does not constitute an “orchestrated campaign”.

Not at all. As I said in the OP, I don’t care about his interests and I don’t find BDSM even faintly upsetting. However, I find Evil Captor’s constant references to it irritating and the pattern I’ve seen makes him seem exhibitionistic; that is the behavior that makes him a freak - the bondage here isn’t really a central issue here at all. Exhibitionism in real life is generally considered a type of sexual assault. While I don’t think Evil Captor is a raincoated pervert who gets his jollies showing off to women in shopping malls, I do think that his unending references to it here are pretty much the same impulse.

Naw, you’re not oblivious. I only came out about a year ago.

I often randomly interject pop culture references, puns, etc into posts. Because I enjoy those things. It irritates some people. What makes EC’s situation different?

Or should we not be allowed to talk about things that irritate you, personally? Do we need to run each post by you, so you can decide if we’ve exceeded our quota for posting about our hobbies?

There is a thread in ATMB where Inkleberry admits that other people ‘helped’ her find all those posts. People agreeing with a pit OP is nothing new and we have all seen pileons. But this shit storm started brewing on another message board.

Did you miss the bit where I explained why I find this creepy and exhibitionistic? Like I said, I think he gets off on using this place as a spot to constantly bring up a taboo subject; I find that creepy and inappropriate, and pretty similar to him exposing himself. Only here it’s him exposing his interest in rape and whipping.

Uh, context. C K brought up the fact that we don’t tolerate organized attacks here - and since I had already disclaimed any involvement in such in the OP, it seemed like a covert accusation that I had been involved. As I said in the OP, I understand perfectly why inkleberry’s thread was closed - she admitted having “help” in the original Pit thread as well as the ATMB one. Read the whole thread before replying.

I understand this rule.
I also understand why the other thread was closed.

However, I do not understand this point’s relevance in this thread unless you’re also attempting to state that if a topic is simulatenously being posted about on another board, we cannot discuss it here.

is that the case?