How does one say something 24.76 times?
Hmmm, I guess you could say a set of a hunded words 24 times, then on the 25th time stop after the 76th word.
I stand corrected.
I was deliberately being stupid, stoopid. 
How does one spell stupid with a “oo”?
::::d&r::::: 
You know, I quoted the OP and snipped out the stupid stuff. Here’s what I got:
Stupyd, Stupyd- not too bright
In the halls of the Far Right.
What Stupyd hand or eye,
Dare frame thy fearful stupydity?
Reavers, reivers, yeh, I was thinking of the Faulkner title, but didn’t have the book on hand to check the spelling. Then this morning when I checked my (old-fashioned printed and bound) dictionary I couldn’t find either spelling. Then dictionary.com only had “reave”. Oh, well. Be not bereaved at my bumbling.
Do not go stupid into that dense night!
Neocons do spin and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the laughter of the bright.
Those wiseguys at Fox News say dark is light.
Because their words from truth departed, they
En masse go stupid into that dense night.
I locked myself in my car today. Again.
Anyway, I had some time to think about this while I was driving to the Triple-A for them to get me out. And I decided it would be kind of nice to have the President be a little smarter than me. For a change.
Well, I better not try my hand at poetry.
I think I’d rather perform a dance.
My own version of “Seven Veils”, with a slight modification: instead of uncovering myself, I will be removing shrouds off the inner souls of my Democratic spectators.
Maestro, music, please! (imagine music: rapturous, dangerous, enchanting, pulsating, entrancing, etc.)
First cover coming off (Let the heavy breathing begin) now:
No, you are not stupid, please don’t dissemble. I am “stupid”. You are “smart”. That’s why you are trying to distract attention from the long word that I so carefully and laboriously spelled out for you in the beginning, remember: To-ta-li-ta-ri-an. The sum of all your responses demonstrates single uniform way of thinking.
Music continues…
Only to you, buckaroo. What it demonstrates is “agreement”, which is in no wise the same as “totalitarian”. That means an enforced agreement.
[QUOTE=New Iskander]
. . . No, you are not stupid, please don’t dissemble. I am “stupid”. You are “smart”. That’s why you are trying to distract attention from the long word that I so carefully and laboriously spelled out for you in the beginning, remember: To-ta-li-ta-ri-an. The sum of all your responses demonstrates single uniform way of thinking… .
[QUOTE]
[Inigo Montoya] I do not think that word means what you think it means. [/Inigo]
Wow, Godwin’s Law in the OP. Is that some kind of record?
Incidentally, why is the second line of your little poem a question? Never mind, it’s probably just because you’re stupid.
Wrong. To-ta-li-ta-ri-an means consensual, passionate, heart-felt absolute agreement, or group-think, brooking no dissent and admitting no opposite view as a “normal” alternative.
Um, no. Totalitarian means “a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life, the individual is subordinated to the state, and opposing political and cultural expression is suppressed” (source - Dictionary.com)
You just described the majority of folks who watch Fox News and listen to Rush Limbaugh.
That’s an advanced stage. We are not there yet.
May be. However, in this thread I’d like to concentrate on To-ta-li-ta-ri-an Left.
Nice to finally get it in writing.
Can’t say I blame them, however…
…are you saying anybody said this at the convention? I’ve watched damn close to the whole thing so far and I failed to notice.
Just for the record, it’s differently, fucko.
You’re stupid because you’re rambling and seem to have trouble with simple concepts. It’s not a political thing.
Suits me fine.
So… people get into heated political disagreements sometimes, and this is the Democrats’ fault somehow? Please.
Not that the Democrats here are unable to criticize their own.
You must think this is a clever tautology, but it’s actually moronic. Just like the rest of this dumbass post. (Oh no! I’m calling you stupid!)
You shouldn’t use big words if you don’t have a fucking clue what they mean. I makes you sound s-t-u-p-i-d.
Oh yeah, very Nazi-looking convention so far. Clearly if you don’t like them, they must be Nazis. :wally
Um … it’s to-tal-i-tar-i-an. Stupid. And please get your icky primordial ooze off my jackboots, m’kay?
The Only Consistent Feature of All of Your Dissatisfying Relationships is You.
God I love that site.
Enjoy,
Steven
Oh, yes. It must be a rising totalitarian left, like a rising threat that we hear about so much lately –rising threats, not being real threats but being conjecturally capable of becoming a threat some time in the unforeseeable future.
You know, there is no pretense to reason in the OP. It is like listening to poor old Bob Dole’s rhetorical cheap shots at the Convention last night. It might have entertained the hell out of Bob but it didn’t make much sense as political thought or comment. So too with our friend – like eavesdropping on the retired bachelor farmers on the bench in front of the pool hall bitching about the communists and Michigan drivers. A rant it is and a rant it will remain, though not a very good one.