Do women ever complain about being "Nice Girls"?

Slightly off-topic (but commenting on something in the OP), but I actually agree with both sides of that argument.

On one hand, it does seem to me, that when it comes to women, nice guys finish last. Based on guys I know, I see an inverse correlation between niceness (sensitivity, maturity, sense of fairness) and success with the opposite sex. I’m not sure which way the cause-effect relationship goes though.

On the other hand, the kind of guy who thinks women should be all over him because he’s such a swell dude has other problems than being nice.

There are definitely guys like this, but I’ve got to say the opposite is much more common. I’d say a woman being high-maintenance is a real turn off for lots of men. And by high maintenance I mean the kind of woman who’s rude to people, has a short fuse, excessively loud etc.

Eh. I think you may be confusing cause and effect here. I’ve known many women who dated jerks, but I’ve known very, very few who dated ugly jerks. ISTM that good looking people are just more likely to be jerks.

deleted

Well, I did say in my post that there might be an alternative cause-effect (guys who are successful becoming jerks because of that).

As for your point, I can only state my experience: jerks really seem to do better, all other things being equal.

For a guy, attitude and confidence are all important. And there’s something about the jerk that they come across well to women initially. It could be that women don’t like guys who seem like they’re trying to hard: who agree with everything the woman says, are always nice to her etc. And the jerk comes across as refreshingly frank.
Too late she realises he’s just a jerk.

There you have it.

Every whining loser guy thinks that the hot babe should lower her superficial standards and see him for his “inner person”.

On a somewhat related topic, I was watching Sarah Silverman on Bill Maher last night. She made an interesting point that there are a lot of women who act rude and obnoxious and then say “oh I’m just a Diva” “You’re not a Diva” said Sarah, “your a ‘cunt’.” You can’t simply declare yourself a “diva” and treat that as an excuse to act like an asshole.

I’ve observed that people who frolic in the label of “telling it like it is” are rarely particularly nice people.

Wow. Let’s go out on a date Small Hen and see who out-averages the other first!
I’m the very definition of unremarkable, so in theory we would get along great. If your idea of a fun evening is a game of Trivial Pursuit, I’m your man. :cool:

Right. “Telling it like it is” is just an excuse for being a jerk. Civilized people know how to be diplomatic. They also know when to shut up.

I think that’s because, as others have already said, men are a lot more likely to candidly admit that they prefer good-looking women. I doubt that you’d find a single guy who would say that looks have no effect on a man’s desire.

In contrast, it’s hardly uncommon for women to say “Of course we want nice guys! Why wouldn’t we?” or “Who says that women tend to be drawn to jerks? That’s ridiculous.” Now, I’ll heartily admit that a lot of women do admit that bad boys have a certain appeal. A lot of them would also admit that a significant number of their women are drawn to unsavory men. My point is simply that I think there’s a reason why women are more likely to ascribe their lack of success to some physical shortcoming. That’s because men are much more likely to admit that they place disproportionate emphasis on physical appearance, whereas women are more likely to deny that the whole “bad boy” mentality is attractive to their gender (or even to a significant portion of their gender).

Hey, I’m really interesting, and I like Trivial Pursuit too!

Curiously, in “what do you look for in a mate?” surveys, men consistently list “sense of humor” before anything else. Women do too, but to a lesser extent.

To a man, does “sense of humor” mean “willing to put up with a lot of crap”? “Able to laugh off wet towels on the floor and the toilet seat up” unlike the last “uptight” partner they had? :wink:

I’m not really sure what the female equivalent to a Nice Guy is, but I suspect that it’s similar in bitterness and blame. “Can’t handle a strong woman like me” roughly translates to “I’m a castrating bitch.” Or it’s about her looks. Yes, we men care about looks. We don’t owe anyone an apology for that, we’re not about to change, and it’s not a character flaw. It’s the way we evolved, and as unfair as it may seem, it’s reality.

But let’s talk briefly about Nice Guys. There seems to be an assumption that there are only two types of men, nice ones and jerks, and that they are at opposite ends of the spectrum. In fact, they are at the same end of the spectrum, where they wallow in insecurity. Jerks are just better at covering it up. The opposite end is the kind of guy secure enough in himself to not suck up AND not put others down.

Women don’t reject Nice Guys because of some character flaw. It makes total sense from an evolutionary perspective.

Let’s compare men to songs for a second. Imagine your favorite rock song, something with a real edge. Now take out the offensive lyrics, because we wouldn’t want to offend anyone. And remove the distortion from the guitars, because geez, distortion sounds so messy. And don’t make the drums so loud, we don’t want to hurt anyone’s ears. And take out the syncopation, because we don’t want to offend little old ladies.

What are we left with? Elevator music. A nice guy is the dating equivelent to Muzak. There’s nothing there to offend, but there’s nothing there to get excited about, either.

Now let’s take this guy back to the stone age. Can you really depend on a guy like that to protect his family from a sabertooth tiger? What do you suppose happened to women that were attracted to guys like that? Do you think that they survived long enough to pass on their genes?

“Yeah, but we’re not in the stone age anymore!” No, but our attraction mechanisms are. Our attraction mechanisms are finely tuned systems that evolved long before there was anything resembling humanity, and are not subject to any sort of higher logic. Blaming women for making poor choices is like blaming them for being the products of a billion years of evolution. Whining about it isn’t going to undo even a bit of it.

So why do women like jerks? They don’t really. They like emotional strength. Jerks just so happen to display some of the same characteristics.

I hope that makes sense. I’m still not fully awake yet.

Good lord. This is a whole lot o’thinkin’ (not that that’s a bad thing), but doesn’t it really come down to the fact that anyone who insists that they can’t get a date not because of any defect of theirs, but because of the warped standards and emotional inadequacies of the entirety of 50% of the human race, is not someone you wanna hang with?

Anyone who thinks the problem is “everyone else” is a sad, delusional person who has no real sense of either themselves OR anyone else.

That makes a lot more sense than I do even when I am fully awake. :slight_smile:

I dated the Nice Guy. The kind that Jenny described earlier. And the emotional warfare he tried to inflict on me was amazing, even after we broke up and tried to “stay friends.” It became so toxic, I had to do exactly what she said - cut him off in a dramatic and total fashion. This after we’d already been broken up for over 2 years and I was dating someone else.

I don’t know if “Nice Girl” equals fat. I’m fat, and definitely more a naughty girl than a nice one. But then again, **elmwood **doesn’t seem like my type.

Anyway, to me, the equivalent of “Nice Girl” is the one who suddenly becomes the convenience store girlfriend. Y’know, the one where the guy can stop by for a quick bite, some supplies, maybe some laundry, and a roll in the hay. Then he’s up and on his way to his real life, not taking her with him. She’s his 7-11, always open and available, no matter what the hour.

Everyone knows that you only go to the 7-11 when you need something quick, it’s not really where you do your serious shopping.

Well, everyone but the 7-11 girl knows that.

Lest I get grouped with any whiny guys: I didn’t whine about the situation, and I don’t class myself as one of these hypothetical “nice guys” (actually, I haven’t really thought about it…)
I was just making an observation. It’s a pretty unfashionable observation to make, because it’s used by so many guys as an excuse, but anyway…

Is there any actual scientific basis for the kind of evolutionary psychology that tdn mentions?

There is, but I doubt I can find any links to share. There’s a great book called Sperm Wars that I’ve been meaning to read for quite a while. The author backs up all of his claims with solid cites.

But doesn’t it just make common sense? That we evolved to be attracted to certain traits? It’s pretty obvious by looking at the animal kingdom. It’s a scientific fact that peacocks with bad plumage spend their Saturday nights at home alone watching porn.

If I said this every time I’d thought it in this thread, I’d have worn out my posting fingers by now.

I think I’m in broad agreement with tdn, though, based on my observations of my own life. The biggest issue is that the label of “Nice Guy” tends to alienate guys in the middle to trending-emotionally-stronger ranges of the spectrum described.

– Zer, former “Nice Guy”, now just a guy who happens to be nice