D’oh!
My former fiance was unaltered and very proud of this. I had up until that time never experienced a man with his foreskin intact and it was interesting but he was much more sensitive than I was expecting. It took a while for me to adjust to his specifics about oral sex and this wasn’t as fun for me as I’d hoped. Visually, he wasn’t unappealing.
We broke our engagement over other issues and I married a much less finicky man with his foreskin removed in infancy. He likes my technique just fine.
So…if they won’t date men who are “uncut”, or conversely won’t date men who are cut, does that mean they require a man to drop his pants before saying yes or no to a first date? 
Yeah, how exactly do you find this out before some sort of point of no return?
“Oh, no. Oh, no, no, no. Sorry, but I’m going to have to throw you back.”
I gotta admit, though, I’ve never come into personal contact with an intact foreskin, but to me they just look kind of, er, wrong. (Did somebody somewhere say they look like they have no personality? Because they’re right.)
Kinda always reminded me of that kid with the pull down hat on the Cosby Gang cartoon.
Kinda always reminded me of that kid with the pull down hat on the Cosby Gang cartoon.
I imagine if given the choice post-birth that most men, even if they like being circumsized now, would decline to have it done on the horror-factor alone.
elfkin477 & Zsofia-
Yeah I guess that does pose somewhat of a logistical problem. I don’t know, maybe they just would be less likely to give it a second go-round. I’ve been on the “winning” side of these objections, so I didn’t really question it.
shrug
A cock is a cock is a cock.
shrug
I think the un-cut ones are rather cute, though.
Well, if Mr. Armadillo were out of the question and I was still looking for a potential mate, it’s not as though if I would be dating a guy, and it was going wonderfully, and blah blah, and we got down to it and he was circumcised that I would be like “Sorry, bucko. Zip up and go home”. It’s simply that I prefer sex with intact men. I don’t think the simple presence or absence of a foreskin would be a deciding point in continuing the relationship, but the difference in the quality of sex might be =P.
Seriously though, I really love the mechanics of the intact penis. Plus, to quote glarGH, it’s cute.
peace,
~mixie
don’t care.
they look the same when hard anyway.
have found no actual difference in my “experience” (sorry JDT).
and i know circumcised guys who have less staying power than their uncut brothers…
so all in all, because of the potential trauma, risk of post op complications and just general distaste at hurting babies, i’m against.
as long as they’re clean, foreskins are things of beauty and joys forever!
Well unlike breasts its not really apparent until the pants come off.
And while i’m against it happening to infants,
I seriously don’t think i’d want to be in a long term relationship with a woman who would reject me over something i had no control over.
I never met an uncut guy until I dated a native of Ireland. He found it amusing that I was taken by surprise. Apparently it is much less common in Ireland than here in the US. jjimm I had an experience quite similar to what you describe 
Good times.
You know people who keep their breasts in their pants? :eek:
You don’t wanna met my friends,trust me…
met=meet of course.
Since this discussion is in GQ, can I request some facts:
Outside of the USA, what is the world % rate for circumcision?
A letter in Cecil’s Column puts it as 85% uncut for the Global population. Is this correct?
Is the rate of circumcision in the US growing or falling? What direction is the trend heading in?
Thanks.
Mrs. RickJay thinks uncut is “gross.” Just another opinion.
According to Elaine on “Seinfeld”, the uncut “look like Martians”.
Shrinkage remains a problem, however.
That sounds about right. Circumcision is very uncommon in China, India, Europe, and South America. That’s a large majority of the World’s population.
Regards,