Oh, are you concerned that the demons may feel their rights have been violated in some way. Look at it this way. At the time of checking the camera system those people thought it was a normal human being and not a spiritual being and still never came to the conclusion of it being a spiritual being. They simply thought some one had came in and not been picked up by the camera system for some reason. In fact I have worked at some places that have had such camera issues.
In any case some people here think I imaged the entire thing so I guess there is no harm done ether way really. I doubt the demon is going to fill a complaint against any one with human resoruces and if I imaged the whote thing it really does not matter.
What are your company policies regarding who has access to video surveillance and for what purposes? My understanding is that generally there are pretty strict guidelines that video surveillance is used for legitimate business purposes. Someone using it to determine if their someone’s lover is visiting or for demonic paranormal investigations would not generally qualify as legitimate business purposes.
If (as claimed) the co-worker also saw the strange person in the employee area and then was unable to find them afterwards, I would consider having the appropriate personnel do a quick check of security footage to be a reasonable response. But that view may not be shared by company management, so who knows.
I personally think it was presenting itself as an attractive black woman because thats what I like. However there were more than multiple demons who came as different races of people. This was just the main one I was dealing with. I am sure it would have presented itself as a woman of a different ethnic group if that’s what I liked.
Some expressions of sexuality have to be suppressed imo. Rape, sex with minors, polygamy, sex with animals, spousal rape. In fact I can even see why there are laws against prostitution as it does not foster marriage which had been the bedrock for our society for so long. Honestly I think society has a vested interest in controlling sexuality. To ensure social order and stability, promote stable family structures, Historically, societal norms around sexuality have often been tied to reproduction and the continuation of the population.
Not since I asked God for forgiveness, started back reading my bible, praying. The majority of them said they were leaving, but would would return the minute I started getting back doing any thing sinful.
Only the one one named Jazibiya showed up for a while and Jesus told me to ignore that being.
I don’t think demons have any rights that our government acknowledges, but I believe they do in the spiritual realm.
I don’t think companies are as strict as your think my friend. I could honestly could come up with dozens of legitimate reason to check camera film that could cover accessing the security footage for personal reasons.
Also since it was management looking for this person who they thought was a random individual who had access the premises and an area usually off limits to the average person I would say it was legitimate as they did not know they were looking for some one who is not a normal woman.
By which you mean the oppression of women. (And men too - like the guy (Kellogg?) who popularized circumcision and routinely mutilated boys’ genitals in the name of discouraging masturbation.)
We have laws to prevent harm from coming from destructive expressions of sexuality, but what a person fantasizes about is not an issue of morality. Fantasies don’t often make sense or fit conventional norms. And that’s fine. Feeling guilty about naturally occurring desires is a form of self-oppression and bad for society.
This creepy behavior became an issue in my workplace. A security guard was watching and rewatching tapes of attractive employees walking by. IIRC he was doing other things that seemed creepy to women, and this rewatching was the thing that tipped him over the edge to getting fired.
I think this activity isn’t reliably harmless, because it could help the security guard grow an obsession about particular coworkers. Besides, it puts a select few in the role of providing sexual entertainment against their will, in an environment where people know one another and need to be able to work together safely.
Harmful or not we still repress some form of sexuality. And the general public is fine with that because it thinks those form of sexuality are destructive. So we are cool with some form of sexuality being repressed. The issue is who decides what forms of sexuality should be repressed and if we are cool with that. I would say the issue is not sexuality being repressed in general.
Who decides what is destructive? In the bible they were said to received their guidance concerning allowed form of sexuality from God directly. Is our standard any better? why is bestiality or polygamy destructive to our society?
In the past certain forms of sexuality were repressed that we did not like and I see no difference now.
May I ask what he was doing that was creepy to woman? I am wandering because people seem to have a tendency to over blow these these days. I am wondering if these allegedly creepy things are some first world problem type of things?
Yes, in my opinion, our standard is better than what a patriarchal society over 2,000 years ago thought sex should be like.
I want to point out that there’s a difference between masturbating and having sex with another person/animal. I couldn’t care less what people fantasize about. I care about harm that occurs to actual people.
Polygamy is almost always about exploiting young girls. Otherwise I don’t give a damn how people structure their families. Right now the thought of multiple income streams sounds pretty desirable.
I think restricting people’s sexuality is, in most cases, a greater harm than allowing people free sexual expression, even if allowing that free sexual expression has some negative repercussions. We rightly have laws against the worst kind of harms. But nobody has a right to restrict my behavior based on their religion.
If you want to restrict your own behavior, that’s your right, but I don’t think it’s healthy.
I have friends who are a thruple: a lesbian, a bisexual woman, and a straight guy. I neither know nor care what they do in bed, but they seem to be a mutually supportive and emotionally healthy family. And yes, they’ve found it really useful to have three independent income streams in the past several years.
To be very clear: of course there are reasons that can be come up with to cover accessing security footage for personal reasons. That in and of itself creeps me out, when done by the staff that has access for legitimate reasons. Other staff having access to that footage for personal reasons, even a bigger violation.
Anyway. These other people who asked who that Black woman (and other individuals?) you were talking to was, and where she went? What did you tell them?