That. In high school people who bought in to the abstinence stuff were always saying, “would you want to wipe with somebody else’s used toilet paper?” and I always asked them in return whether they’d use the same piece of toilet paper twice.
“Don’t forget promiscuity and teen pregnancy. And dancing!”
Okay, it’s not perfect, but you’ve got to give me credit for trying.
Yes, I *have *been in a weird mood, lately. Why do you ask?
I approve of this blatant attempt to create a meme.
Do you think it’s important to have sex with someone before you marry them?
Not really; I DO think that’s important not to marry someone that you haven’t had sex with, though.
Not me. Can y’all PLEASE get on topic?
Nevernind. Were back on topic.
Sure. Let’s have sex.
But that’s only premarital sex in this thread. So I’m out of it, because I’m married: no more premarital sex for me!
You could always get married again.
Correct. You may be married, but you are not married to him. So get to it, folks!
Atheist. Premarital sex is not against my religion, for the same reason it is not against my Oath of Enlistment.
Sexual chemistry is hugely important in a relationship. Good, frisky, gotta-have-it-now-or-my-head-will-explode sexual chemistry. I can’t imagine committing to a relationship forever without verifying that it’s there.
I don’t know why religion was made such a big part of this poll. My main concern is pragmatic; how do you know you will be sexually compatible with someone unless you bloody well do it in the first place? This means either psychologically compatible as well as physically compatible; I’ve heard horror stories about 2 people being way mismatched-he’s much too big, she’s far too tight, or vice-versa. What a horrible thing to find out after you’ve said all the vows…
Because the question the OP is asking has little to do with sex and nothing to do with marriage. It’s troll bait.
I’d like to amend my previous answer. I also think sex before marriage is important because I, for one, exercise much sounder judgment when I’m getting laid regularly. I don’t think I’m alone on this one. Premarital sex --> better marriage decisions, because you’re already getting it so your other brain doesn’t get a vote.
Excuse me! You might want to read the entire thread before making such rude accusations. I demonstrated my logic quite clearly:
I expect a charter member to know better. I demand a retraction.
Because there’s no other reason to abstain before marriage?
I’ve reported the post accusing the OP of being “troll bait”. It’s a stupid accusation: some people think that provocative OPs are trolling. However, provocative postings are what makes a forum like this live.
Oh yeah? How about the oxytocin bond. When having sex our bodies release the bonding hormone.
That seems like a very good reason to wait to have sex with your mate. And that is biological, not religious.
Uh, I was actually trying to defend your phrasing of the question, but whatever.
Chemical pair bonding is not a valid reason to abstain from sex. It doesn’t prevent you from bonding with a future mate, and it doesn’t require intercourse to occur.
<mod>
The “T” word has no place outside of the Pit.
If this is your opinion, in the future please use the Report button and report it to the Mods.
Thank you.
</mod>
You are wrong.