Does President Trump use private “goon squads” to deal with people who displease him somehow?
Could he become America’s “Papa Doc”?
If he doesn’t, I’m sure that his supporters would like to see him do so, given the frequency with which they’re always complaining about Soros’s “paid thugs”. Our rightie friends are real big on projection.
There is also the fact that the woman who had the recent confrontation with Sean Spicer reported getting death threats. And the fact that one trumper showed up at Berkeley with his own “riot gear”.
More of a short rant, really.
Off to the Pit.
Hey, he should get them to wear black shirts!
Then he could call them the “Blackshirts.”
He did offer to pay the legal bills for anyone who assaulted a protester at his campaign rallies so why not?
I’d advise them to get their pay up front though and never put the Chinese knockoff black shirts in the washer with any other clothes.
When twitter seems too impersonal, Trump prefers the hands-on touch you only get with hired goons.
Do you have any evidence that he does? Or are you just inventing something?
Hired goons?
The fact is that no, President Trump does not use goon squads. Just another liberal wet dream.
Indeed he does.
You will be contacted shortly.
nm, troll feeding
Looks like the OP is ‘just’ askin’ questions. Questions to which the answers are, presumably, ‘no’.
Does he pat some good boys on the back and put some to the rod?
Why is this even a question?
Are we running low on existing fuckery to deal with when it comes to the orange jackass?
I hear he was into receiving corporal punishment.
No, he doesn’t.
But like every major political figure, Republican or Democrat, he does have surrogates who go on television to defend him and his political actions, objectives, and accomplishments. People like Jeffrey Lord and Kayleigh McEnany on CNN, for instance.
Every day, I am absolutely amazed. I think the comments on this board about Trump have got to have hit bottom and can’t sink any lower in the Slough of Childish Stupidity. And daily I get proven wrong.
Apparently, the problem is not that the folks here have hit bottom. The problem is that you keep digging deeper.
A loaded term to be sure; however, the use of private security answerable to him personally rather than Secret Service security answerable to the government as an institution would clearly fall within its definition.
Are you afraid they might one day reach your level? Don’t worry, the idiocy in your posts are digging with a backhoe and you’ve a huge head start.