you funny, max torque.
Max, ox and sheep are not pets. Pets have a different relationship to people than livestock do.
Satan is not redressing the injury to the pet. Note that he’s throwing the pet, not the man, out the window. He’s addressing the emotional injury to the person.
Anyway, Satan has carte blanche to take it out of context when quoting scripture for his purposes. 
Well, as hell doesn’t exist, I can’t think of a new punishment there for this guy. Instead, I merely suggest that the perpetrator be tried and, if convicted, imprisoned to serve his term.
In a kennel.
Sua
Hm, “pets” versus “animals owned by people”…that’s as close as it gets in the NIV. If you can find something referring specifically to “pets”, by all means, produce it.
The passage I quoted wasn’t to redress injury to the animal either, but to compensate the animal’s owner for the wrongful damaging of his property. The Old Testament isn’t very enlightened when it comes to punishments for “intentional infliction of emotional distress”. Gee, maybe it was a mistake to bring the Bible into it in the first place, huh?
Satan didn’t bring up the Bible, you did. If you want to be cruel to the dog-pitcher, that’s your business, but don’t claim it’s a Biblically-appropriate punishment.
I’m not sure if the word “euthanizing” was your choice or the newspaper’s but whichever, it’s a poor choice of word. “Euthanasia” is killing a person or animal to relieve its suffering. When you kill a person or animal because it did something dangerous in the past, or appears likely to do something dangerous again, the proper word is “execution”.
Max: How do you know that a million people didn’t donate 12 cents each?
Often, for causes like this, people put out little jars at veterinarian’s offices, pet stores and shelters. People toss in a few nickles and dimes. When was the last time you saw a jar labeled, “Help find the murderer of Joe Smith”? You probably haven’t, because we all pay the police to do that. The police don’t devote nearly as much time to things like this as they do to solving robberies, rapes and murders, for obvious and sensible reasons.
I’ve been reading about this since it happened, and I’m no less outraged now than I was then. A little dark part of me would like to see this guy tossed in front of a moving 18-wheeler; but, if convicted, I think he should get the maximum jail time, a hefty fine, and have to spend every weekend for the next three years working at an animal shelter, seeing the kinds of abuse that animals are subjected to.
Author! Author!
An even darker corner of me doubts he’d have the wish or capacity to understand even then. Maybe I’m just feeling low right now, but I wonder if he’ll have to get smacked with an up close and personal karmic payback before he understands; be completely vulnerable and suffer casual, unthinking cruelty himself.
Veb
It distress me that some jerk was so devoid of emotions that he killed a defenseless animal as payback for someone accidentally hitting him. That doesn’t mean it wouldn’t distress me MUCH MORE were it her CHILD.
Regardless, I am in a state of shock that people on this board are so indignant over the subsequent OUTRAGE.
It was just a dog.
Well, fuck you. If someone came into your house and robbed you, I would never say to you, “Get over it. It was just your THINGS.”
Loss of trust is much harder to get over than the loss of your dog.
No, I don’t like humans much at all, I care more about most mammals. I also feel empathy for reptiles and birds, but not as much.
If you honestly believe I am using attempting to use biblical support to advocate in all seriousness that this guy really should suffer a contrived and bizaare punishment (by Satan, in Hell, mind you) I think you’ve been whooshed. Any claims of the biblical appropriateness were for entertainment purposes only. No warantee implied, void in Colorado and Mississippi. I defended my position with tongue planted firmly in cheek. Smilie, smilie, smilie, &c.
The big reason they collected $120K - the story got airplay. It’s exactly the sort of “human interest” story with an odd twist to it that every news station will play for all it’s worth. A “normal” murder isn’t news, and any development important enough to affect the lives of a large number of people will be too abstract to play on peoples emotions with. The average listener would rather emote than think, which is precisely what a commercial sponsor wants - if the audience started exhibiting a degree of rationality, who would respond to advertising?
And yet, for some unfathomable reason, pigs now are. City people: y’all so STRANGE!
Oh yea, as an aside (and this certainly isn’t an excuse for the putz), I seriously doubt the dog was just sitting there ‘wagging it’s tail’ while the guy screamed at it’s owner. I’ve been around a few bisson frize’s (and no, I can’t spell it) and they’re one of the most hyper, yappy little doggies you’ll ever meet. I’m sure it’s high-pitched barking wasn’t calming an already tense situation where-as a pit bull (or mastiff, or Irish wolfhound) just might have convinced el moron to take his chest-thumping elsewhere.
Yet another reason not to buy small, neurotic dogs with no self-preservation instinct: far from protecting you, they might actually get you killed.
Wabbit:
You are truly and ass. It’s almost unbelievable (unless you’re an ass, of course) that you are basically blaming the victim in this case for what happened to the dog.
It was a minor fender bender and the ass (the other one, not you) who killed the dog really only had to exchange insurance information with the dog’s owner.
But then, you probably don’t realize that, being the ass you are.
Damn. Make that “tuly an ass” instead of “truly and ass.” Thanks.
Wabbit: Since this was a local story, I read of the event right after it occurred. The dog’s owner said that the BF was very friendly and social, and was used to driving through fast-food stands with the woman and coming to the window to get attention from the food server. The dog was in her lap and at the window before she even rolled it down and was therefore right within reach of the jerk before yelling could be heard.
Am I the only one, or do I sense in more than one post here the “I hate small, cute dogs too and don’t give a rat’s ass if someone kills them”? Common prejudice.
Wabbit, so we should all change our lifestyles in order to avoid offending the occasional psychopath who may cross our path? If the dog bit the guy, taking revenge on the dog might be somewhat understandable. But barking? Dear God, we should all be glad her kid wasn’t whining in the back seat!
Hmm, and to think I thought that saying “this doesn’t excuse the guy” would be sufficient. Apparently not. So here’s what I’d like to have happen to him: long jail term (etc. etc.) surrounded by hordes of yapping bishon frise’s. Justice will then have been served.