And I quote:
[QUOTE=john L]
…you’re just another critic w/ no evidence.
attack the messenger is your only rebut.
[/QUOTE]
So I have no evidence but you don’t have to?
This isn’t moving the goalposts…there are none.
If I can get a good history of present illness out of a four year old (and I can) I should be able to get a straight response out of a Trump supporter!
john L,
-
Do you believe “polls will change after 1st debate” or not? “Yes” or “No” is fine.
-
If you believe they will change then in whose favor do you think they will change? “Clinton” or “Trump” is fine.
-
If you believe they will change then do you believe the change will significantly impact the likely outcome of the election? “Yes” or “No” is fine.
So far only three words required. Excuse that question 4 potentially requests more …
- If you believe that there will be a significant change based on the debate performance on what do you base that belief? (Feel free to resort to one word or a short phrase, like “gut”, or “just do”, or “Clinton sucks” if you must.)
Nope, just another attempted insult. :rolleyes:
again… just like DSeid… false statement.
gonna let you mental giants figure out why.
it’s right there as you typed it.
you guys are so consumed w/ Trump bashing… you can’t think straight.
carry on.
what evidence do i need to supply johnny ace ?:rolleyes:
“Says who!?”
Pickles are nice.
a smart feller like you that can take a 4 yr. pld’s hx … oughta be able to figure out where he went wrong w/o my ole dumbazz answers.
carry on. :rolleyes:
sorry guys.
snarky , cocky , stupid posts get snarky , cocky , stupid answers.
i can do it either way ya like… nice or nasty.
ya’ll also get several 10 yard penalties for " piling on " tonight. ha!
That’s a first. You should feel privileged, you’re the only person to make my ignore list.
I haven’t made any posts to this point, so I can’t be included in this.
So I’ll ask politely, do you think the debates will change the polls in Trumps favour?
Ah, the “I’m so brilliant you losers can’t hope to win against me, and my multiple incoherent posts are merely proof that I’m playing 4-dimensional chess with y’all” gambit. That’s always been a favorite approach for many of this board’s former posters.
I don’t know, about a zillion times I guess? Over an entire lifetime of being in the public eye.
If you are pointing to the fact you don’t see her on TV that much in the last few months, what is your point? You buying into the “health issues” theory?
If you are saying she can’t hold her own in a debate with Trump, then I think you are dead wrong on that. She may not be the chattering media whore that the camera can’t help focusing on, but she is smart, experienced, and actually knows WTF she is talking about. You know, like a serious candidate.
This is a Warning that name calling and personal insults are not permitted outside The BBQ Pit.
Knock it off.
And your passive aggressive, snide remarks in which you refuse to answer direct questions regarding your own statements is not appropriate behavior, either.
Either actually participate in the discussion, or find somewhere else to post.
[ /Moderating ]
EVERYONE, back off on the personal remarks.
[ /Moderating ]
Do not post regarding who is or who is not on your ignore list.
[ /Moderating ]
I think john L wasn’t talking about Hillary Clinton but about Kellyann Conway.
The National Enquirer.
Okay, so what john L is saying is that Trump needs to win in the debates, and if he doesn’t his campaign is toast. No statement about how likely this is.
…Okay, never mind, he thinks that Trump will see some major increase in the polls afer the first debate…
…Or maybe not. What.
This all makes no sense. Barring some bizarre joker gambit, I think the next move is clear.
Vote: john L
First he used the pseudonym “John Barron”, then it was “John Miller”, now john l…
Is this still the thread for discussing " Donald Trump’s 2016 General Election Campaign"?
If so, the elevation of Steve Bannon, the executive chairman of the right-wing site Breitbart News, to be the Trump campaign’s chief executive is billed as a “surprising and befuddling twist.”
[QUOTE=Will Ritter, a Republican political operative in Virginia who isn’t supporting Trump]
Another guy is going to ride the psychotic horse into a burning stable.
[/QUOTE]