I always liked them myself, but plenty of New Yorkers thought they were too big, too ugly, too simple and too dominent, especially compared to other, earlier skyscrapers.
Cite. I know it’s Salon, and they hate everything, but it still makes valid points.
My heart sank when I saw all that … of all the dang things to happen after Trump and the Deplorables had been absolutely spittle-flecked with conspiracies about her health. But as the day wore on, and I learned that a doctor had given her a diagnosis of[EMAIL=“http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/12/us/politics/hillary-clinton-campaign-pneumonia.html?_r=0”] pneumonia Friday morning, and she had been put on antibiotics, it all suddenly made sense. Her cold-like symptoms, her raspy cough.
So, I think it turns out in her favor - she said all along that she’s a workhorse, not a showhorse, so she ploughed ahead with what had to be done. An admirable trait for a president.
Some people are ragging on her staff for allowing her to attend the memorials, but I’ll bet it was Hillary’s decision. She wanted to honor the 9/11 heroes and victims … and certainly didn’t want to appear weak to her opponent.
I grew up in NY in the 70s, one of my uncles has lived two blocks from the Twin Towers since before they were built, and another uncle is a community representative for urban design proposals… and I can attest that it’s true, the general consensus among New Yorkers was that the Twin Towers were boring-looking, cold-feeling, and too big (though impressive due to their size, and the view from the top – especially outdoors, on the roof – was fun). Some felt their one saving grace was that there were two of them – the twin-ness gave them a touch of poetry, famously exploited by tightrope walker Phillippe Petit.
The Twin Towers were ghastly. Absolutely ugly in themselves, and hostile to most values of good urban design. From a purely architectural viewpoint, good riddance.
You’d prefer a smaller one?
They’re probably still pissed off about Norm Coleman keeping Al Franken out of the Senate for a stupidly long time after the 2008 election via repeated recounts and challenges. I’d be surprised if this got any real traction, but presumably they’re just trying to create more headaches for the GOP.
Reminds me of the famous Dennis Skinner incident in the UK Parliament: At one point Skinner commented that “Half the Tory members opposite are crooks.” When instructed by the Speaker to withdraw the remark, Skinner quipped, “OK, half the Tory members aren’t crooks.” 
Trump’s Tweet this morning:
“@realDonaldTrump on Hillary’s health:
I hope she gets well, gets back on the trail & we’ll see her at the debate”
He’s handling this well and with class.
Hands up - who thinks that was written by a staff member?
I do not find this surprising in the least.
First of all, it is a fact well supported by many, many examples that campaign spending is not a panacea that papers up every campaign problem. If it were, Meg Whitman would be governor of California. The connection between campaign spending and electoral success is not as clear cut as people assume.
Secondly, Trump is running an unorthodox and highly effective campaign that does not require huge ad buys. I know everyone thinks he’s insane, but he is not. He’s a sociopathic asshole, but he is much, much more clever than he is given credit for here, and he has successfully established a firm base of voters by conducting a campaign that is distinctly atypical of Presidential campaigns. None of this is an accident.
Having now solidified a base of about 40% of the voters, he’s going to spend the next two months trying his best to look like a normal candidate to win over undecided and swing voters. You read it here first; he’s going to try his damndest to be less Trumpish and more conventional now. He doesn’t have to spend a ton of money, he just has to “look Presidential.”
[QUOTE=Snowboarder Bo]
Who exactly does Mr. Trump think this will turn away from Mrs. Clinton?
I don’t think he understands how this whole voting thing works.
[/QUOTE]
Of course he does. He’s merely commenting to support his base, firing them up. And sure, it might affect an undecided voter or two. Again, he is not stupid. He does not have early-onset Alzheimer’s. He’s hideous and ignorant in many ways, but smart at what he does, and he has done a total end run around the way these things are usually done, is close to being elected President, and people still seem unwilling to believe it.
Clinton’s comments were stupid. She is proposing to be the President of the United States of America, a capacity in which she must serve all Americans, including the (at least) 55 million or so of whom will vote for Trump. Even the ones whose opinions she doesn’t like will be her employers, and it is her job to serve them, and it’s hard to convince people you plan to well serve them if you think they’re worthless.
I thought we were going to build a wall to keep out all the illegal immigrants engaging in voter fraud?
I think my cellphone just tried to raise its hand.
Doesn’t seem to be in his timeline …
Oh, it was something he said on Fox & Friends
Love how he’s going to tell us his “very specific numbers” soon. Only the best numbers for Donald! And he’s certainly going to make her health an issue now - classy!
Here:
It’s a tweet of his actual statement. (bonus recording of the interview)
After Clinton’s remarks about half of Trump’s supporters being “deplorable,” Roger Stone posted an Instagram of a Photoshopped image of Trump and supporters as The Deplorables.
The image prominently includes Pepe the Frog. (Since I’m not at all cognizant of alt-right shit, I would never have known that Pepe is a white supremacist mascot.)
So, let me get this straight … Trump supporters want to deride Clinton’s remarks about them being deplorable, so they use a symbol of one of the most deplorable movements in the US. You can’t make this shit up.
I think a Clinton supporter should Photoshop of Clinton with some of her more well-known supporters. Of course, it would have to be a much bigger picture than Stone’s. And include Kermit the Frog in the picture.
To Who it My Concern
I am a real doctor that went to school and everything. I examined Donald J Trump and it is my doctor opinion that he is the healthiest individual alive on the planet. His blood tested positive for everything.
Urinalysis and Colonoscopies were not required. His energies are in such perfect balance that he does not urinate or defecate. He does not even have a rectum, he has no need for one. His skin is tough as steel and he is impervious to any sort of physical injury, up to and including bullets. And he has the sexiest hair on Earth.
His specific results are as follows. The A stands for AWESOME !!
Lungs 100% A++
Intestines 100% A++
Stomach 100% A++
Pancreas 100% A++ - he has the BEST pancreas !!
Liver 100% A++
Hands 100% A++ and they are HUGE, in the 110th percentile for size.
While examining his penis and testicles, I was overcome with such a crippling sense of inadequacy that I locked myself in my office and wept for an hour. Speaking as a medical doctor, I cannot understand why any woman would want to have sex with any man that isn’t Donald J Trump.
It is my medical doctor opinion that Donald J Trump will live forever.
Signed
Dr. John Baron, a real doctor
Seems legit.
Perhaps he took his meds this morning.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Right - you said it was “Trump’s Tweet this morning”, but it’s actually a tweet from Fox & Friends, repeating a comment he made on their TV show. It neglects the part where Donald says that Clinton’s health is now an issue in the race.