Donald Trump's 2016 General Election Campaign

Binders full?

How could we dare follow the example of Australia, the Texas of the Pacific. Now, with these laws, their animal life comes in but three varieties: animals that will kill you and eat you, animals that will only kill you and the insufferably adorable! Don’t let that happen here!

Your ratio of coherent to incoherent posts has taken a noticeable slide towards the latter.

Trump attacks Hillary for wanting to repeal the Second Amendment, but he admitted today that he wants to repeal the First Amendment.

Bereft. Inconsolable.

I want Obamacare overturned or at least fixed.
I think that the people who came into America illegally should be deported (as they have broke the law). I am not saying I am against immigration, but it should be legal. For the large part of my family that is Filipino, it is something worth doing correctly.
I hate the deal with Iran. I have seen argument points about how it will slow them down, but I thought the embargos were doing just fine.
I do not want this Obama apologizing for America business. (Japan)
I was very skeptical of the gay marriage thing, because of possible legal issues, but none have arisen. So I can’t say anything bad there, because everyone deserves happiness.
I feel like she will not lead a war on ISIS correctly. Not against muslims in general. As I fear Trump will. (Sadly for both points)
I feel like she has been, and will continue, to use her position to amplify her foundation.
I also fear that there is a lot of information out there that can be used against her. (Talking email leaks)
Then of course the 2nd amendment issues that I have.

Those are the issues I am working for and that I aim to find the straight dope on.
I never expected my choices to be between Trump and Hillary, so I am still learning as much as I can. Most information seems biased and leaning one way or another. I can make a list equally long about things that I do not like about Trump, however I feel that I am stuck in this position, because of that list.

Sorry If my list is ignorant. I do not claim to have any of that in fact. That is why I am on here reading constantly. My outburst earlier was because I feel like the name calling and shit is pointless. Someone telling me Trump and his supporters are everything that the “deplorables” are. I feel that over using words like that take away their power.

So tear me apart I suppose, but I felt obliged for running my mouth, to at least give my reasons, and maybe find some enlightenment.

Sorry, figured I would add going home. I will be on to check, read, and reply tomorrow. Gnite folks.

Your response to people pointing out your incoherence, however, has remained rock steady for over a decade.

He’s not going to repeal the First Amendment – that would take too much time. He’ll just start trying to politicize the DoJ and attempt to find political support for congressional laws or executive orders that have a serious chilling effect on free speech and then dare the courts to stop him. He’ll ignore court orders. To paraphrase a quote attributed to Andrew Jackson: the courts have made their ruling - now let them enforce it.

Easy.
Down at the bottom.

[QUOTE=Hillary Clinton]
“I’m not looking to repeal the Second Amendment. I’m not looking to take people’s guns away. But I am looking for more support for the reasonable efforts that need to be undertaken to keep guns out of the wrong hands.”
[/QUOTE]

And its quite simple: don’t read them. I’ll get over it.

That open type of speech isn’t enough for me. “Wrong hands” is up to the interpreter.

Which description of “wrong hands” that Mrs. Clinton has used to find objectionable and vague?

Is it the suspected terrorists, the domestic abusers, the violent criminals or the severely mentally ill?

Translation: I won’t accept as “intelligent” any robust criticism or rebuttal of my preferred reality-denying echo chamber.

Nm

Yeah, I get it buddy. That is exactly the same as your sarcastic “bereft. Inconsolable” line. Like I said, rock steady. Now please continue with how koala bears have something to do with what we’re talking about.

That is quite a long(and rather vague) list you’ve got there. It seems that when you said that first step would go “a long way”, what you meant was that it would be a long way along an unending road.

According to the National Review (hardly a liberal publication) you might want to rethink that.

After discussing how Supreme Court picks over the next presidency won’t matter nearly as much as some would have you believe, the article goes on:

I’m getting “page not found” on that link, but here’s another one.

Both of you give it a rest or take it to the Pit. Your choice.

Ah, Yes the single issue voter. I really think the single issue voter is just not willing to tell you what the second and third issues are. Am I being unreasonable?

The big single issues are abortion and second amendment I suppose. They love those voters, because they are never watching the money.