God dammit, why did I have to get stuck with straight parents? If I’d been raised in a proper same-sex home I could’ve been indoctrinated into this lifestyle so much sooner.
Seriously, though: people think that’s fun? Ah well. Different strokes, I guess. So to speak. As it were.
Are you kidding? Dancing in a room crowded with nearly naked gay boys, covered from the nipples down with all-concealing foam? Honey, it’s fun.
Is the foam edible? Just askin, that’s all.
I really don’t think they’re all that concerned with eating the foam.
I’m fine with the “heat” or tempo of the Pit. I just don’t exactly get off on ad hominem attacks. If others want to come at me with that in mind, fine.
I never said Texas did not influence Textbooks. I believe we do. As I believe Texas is at fault for a whole passle of things. My Cali reference was in jest.
The one thing to which he clarified ( not in the OP mind you) later was the fact that he was bashing all Texans, along with the State.
I think he was a jackass for doing so. Maybe he was mad, whatever. Instead of showing the class of an apology he tries to defend himself, and others jump aboard (not too surprising).
That is what I find/found assinine.
You do realize that you linked an article that claims Texas and California are the two biggest…yadda yadda
Thus my point. But thanks for the links. Texas Board of Education makes the determination in Texas of what books to buy (since someone asked earlier).
As far as fucktard goes, Pit Texans as a whole if you wish (that is your right). Be aware that those in glass houses should not throw rocks, fucktard :wally
[Henry Higgins]“This is what the Texan population, calls an elementary education…”[/Henry Higgins]
perks up Any chances there are a few bisexual lads in there?
Especially with a snorkel and an underwater camera.
You are correct. Because Texas, unlike any other state in the US, requires legislators to win 100% of the vote to get their seat.
And if that doesn’t work, gerrymandering is always an option.
Here’s an article about this case in particular and Cameron’s studies in general. The article attacks Psychological Reports yet doesn’t mention that it is essentially a vanity press (as the editor hedges around, citing “We try to come down on the side of one of the basic tenets of science – free speech for the author” as their “review process”. (PR will print anything for $200 per page and yet it’s still listed as a “scholarly” journal on databases; it has next to no respect in academia.)