Dopers who long to kill, or fantasize about killing, certain groups of strangers

Of course there are differences but I mean , this got almost 11 percent yes votes
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=871207

I’m using a bit more stringent qualification than many posters in this thread and I still count plenty of quite direct fantasies.

By and large even calling them fantasies is a stretch though, I don’t think I’ve ever seen one that made me think " wow, this person is mentally Ill and needs help , they sit around fantasizing about killing people"

It’s all ideological or expressive or hypothetical.

Though many would probably elicit wasteful police visits if they were Twitter posts.

Continent-wide genocide I can kinda get, worldwide genocide is likely a bit much, but galactic genocide is definitely my bright line on that score.

Yep – I agree with you and also suspect (and hope) that it’s just hyperbole, even if the person saying it doesn’t realize it is. That is to say, they wouldn’t actually be capable of committing murder IRL.

But that’s part of why the “save your child” thread was disturbing; so many people were claiming to not even know what’s disturbing about sacrificing millions of innocents to save one child. It implies a completely alien sense of morality.

What about Flyers fans? They’re not even human.

Wouldn’t be capable of murder, I’d agree.

Would be reluctant but still kill, not so much.
Bear in mind some people here have killed, in the military.

So in the sense of if there was actually a war, I have no doubt many would …the likely hood of some civil war scenario though is basically nil. I doubt anyone mentioning it wishes for it.

I can’t imagine the difficulties and disconnect it took to actually kill your own people in the actual civil war, especially just to show the mindset, in the beginning pow camps were basically open and the pows would actually just run away, spend a night out on the local town and then go back.

At least you didnt say Caps fans.

:mad:

I’ll wish death on Tom Wilson – well, maybe not. But I will admit that I can watch the footage of Ryan Reaves knocking him down all day long.

Lucky day for the bloodthirsty Dopers – Velocity started a thread in which they can fantasize about killing the Americans they hate to their heart’s content! https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=21514529

Guess who has the most posts in the thread as of the time of this post?

HurricaneDitka, and that’s with a late start!

Considering the scenario of a civil war is not a fantasy of mass murder. But you know that.

I think the question at hand is whether certain other people know that.

I would hope so. Modern sectarian civil wars are horrific.

Some people need to just stick to playing The Sims. Then you can and torture to your heart’s content.

(Although in the later versions they took out the option of drowning in the pool by deleting the ladders, dammit. That was one of my favorites.)

I’m probably in the running for that title myself.

And for the record, HurricaneDitka’s contributions in that thread do not come off to me as bloodthirsty.

Yes they do. It is the only thing he ever thinks about. How and when he’ll get to shoot people.

It’s pretty clear that in that specific thread the thing he’s thinking the most about is finding anything the non-red side says that he can post a counterargument or rebuttal to, and posting it. Doesn’t have to be about killing people, and he doesn’t have be have a good rebuttal - he just has to score argument points.

Things he has no answer to he carefully ignores - selectively trimming his quotes as needed. Which is needed a lot - the fucker chopped one of my posts off at six words and then claimed that the rest of it didn’t exist! :mad:

Well, obviously the rest of the post was fake! Sad!

Out of curiosity, I checked:

So far, **HurricaneDitka’s **posts in that thread are as follows (paraphrased):

  1. Blue Americans aren’t richer than red Americans
  2. Urban regions have their share of Trump voters and rural regions have their share of liberal voters
  3. Private gun owners have a lot of ammo
  4. Conflict wouldn’t result in either side necessarily “grouping up” first
  5. Civil war would result in loss of electricity and water for both sides
  6. The blue side will not necessarily have the military on its side
  7. Blue side won’t necessarily have better communications
  8. Military and law enforcement won’t necessarily side with the blues
  9. Some post about the logistics of the city of Los Angeles
  10. A post about Hill Air Force Base in Utah
  11. A post about European air and sea transport capability
    None of these posts are/were “bloodthirsty” in the least.

Why are you expecting honesty?

Does this thread include natural disasters? Here’s an example.

I remember when Mount Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines, and my friend’s roommate told me about his friend who had stationed there while in the military. This area had huge issues with homeless street children who would steal anything that wasn’t nailed down, and sometimes things that were, and he said that his friend told him, “I hope that volcano keeps erupting and all those people die.”

:eek:

But then again, I haven’t been there myself.

My point is that the whole reason he is in that thread is because he is constantly thinking about such things. Such a scenario would let him shoot people finally.