Like many, I have been following the kidnapping of the 14 year old Elizabeth Smart in Utah. It is nearly unavoidable to not follow.
I haven’t seen any threads started on/about her, so I thought I would. If this is in the wrong forum, please feel free to move, Oh Benevolent Moderator God/desses.
The first time I saw this was the day after her kidnapping and her parents were making a plea to the media. Her mom, from what I saw, could not even look at the camera. I understand a parents anguish ( not to that level) but this really caught my attention.
If she were truly kidnapped, there would be a ransom note or contact from whomever did it. I have yet to hear her called as “Abducted” ( I could be wrong.) Is there a legal definition/reason between Abducted and Kidnapped, you know, for the court papers?
I know the authorities are/have ruled out that Elizabeth just ran away. And her family ( aunts & Uncles) are cooperating to the full extent by taking lie detector tests, which asking family to do is very common and not always well received.
Something is very fishy that I can’t place my finger on.* So Here I go, all over the map:*
I don’t know if it is the Father’s admission that he had left the garage door open for about two hours, thus enabling the intruder to hide until eveyrone was settled and the fact the media is just swarming over this.
The way the Uncle ( I am not sure who he is related to) is so outspoken. Whether he is the self appointed family spokesperson or they asked him to step up. (I have just read a story about an arsonist who was very clever and hard to catch in his crimes before it was discovered that the Fire Investigator was the one behind all the fires. One who speaks up is the glory hound…et all.)
This family is in Utah, Federal Heights, which I am guessing by the website for her here that is a suburb of Salt Lake City. Mormonville. I’m guessing the family is a member of the LDS, but it is all a guess. While religion shouldn’t factor into something like this, the press usually goes after the LDS, positive or negative. Like the way they go after Scientology (I know, it’s not a religion) or a Catholic (esp, right now with the Past of Pervert preists coming to light.)
The hat found in the garage is a golfers style cap. No one, that I’ve ever seen (YMMV), wears this but older white men Wealthy older white men. I am probably wrong, but who in the hell wears a golfer’s chapeau like that for a kidnapping? All that is missing is plaid knickers. If you were planning to kidnap or commit a crime, wearing something that would make you blend in ( baseball hat) and become anonymous would be imperitive. why not wear a beanie with a propeller on it?
The Smart Family is very wealthy, at least by their house and zip code. Perhaps Mr. Smart (what does he do for a living, or Mrs, for that matter?) got into some shady dealings and someone wanted to shut him up or warn him by taking Elizabeth, but do to the media attention, it got out of hand and could not return her in a timely matter.
Perhaps Elizabeth unknowingly stumbled upon a family secret ( daddy’s, since the intruder was a male.) and because it would bring instant shame upon the family ( or cause mom to want to divorce him, thus losing everything) Elizabeth had to be warned or taken care of in a permanent matter.
I beleive the younger daughter is innocent in this deal and is telling the truth. At nine, in the middle of the night, it would be very easy to scare her.
If they are Mormon, don’t the Mormons protect themselves very highly through malicous tactics ( or am I thinking of Scientologists? Who did the car bombing in SLC years ago? ) and perhaps Daddy stumbled upon some damning evidence about the LDS that needed a very scary warning? going after someones family is the ultimate threat. Money and posessions can be replaced, children cannot.
I hope Elizabeth is found alive and whomever did this is caught, but right now, things are not looking very good.
I don’t really know all that much about the case, but I think it’s kind of fishy too.
The police keep looking for Bret Michael Edmonds and they say he’s not a suspect, but I was thinking that maybe the police think he is an guilty of something, like maybe he was paid to help in the kidnapping or something.
They’ve cooperated with the police, the dad voluntarily submitted to a polygraph, and they both look genuinely anguished. Until I know some more compelling reason to suspect them, other than the fact that she wouldn’t look at the camera (she may be shy AND it is her worst nightmare), I’m giving them the full benefit of the doubt.
You’re right, something is fishy, but when a child is kidnapped from her own bedroom, that’s pretty bizarre in and of itself.
Odd, but my friend who looks like her, beautiful & blond, & also 14 years old, was on a poster
here from Missing Kids. Turned out her uncle had her. Someone spotted her at the airport
here with some plastic bags, so I guess she got on the plane all by herself. When they went to
see if he was with her uncle, she wasn’t there at the time, but they waited & she did show up.
I guess he gave her whatever she wanted or promised it so she came to stay with him.
Therefore, I think this case is a gonna be like that.
There’s certainly shades of JonBenet going on here, in Elizabeth Smart’s physical appearance to her abduction from the home (I know JonBenet was murdered inside the home, but still, there’s a similarity in that the crimes were committed in the residence)
Where was it said the intruder was male? I’ve been absorbed with World Cup news and have neglected the Smart story details.
I’m also confused as to the malicious tactics of the Mormons referred to in the post above.
And handy, I hate to say it, but I think you’re wrong.
Okay, slight hijack here–LDS aren’t necessarily very “defensive and secretive”, at least not any more so than any other religious group. Things that LDS consider to be sacred don’t get talked about except in the appropriate places. So if that’s secretive, sobeit. And one does tend to get a little defensive when one gets attacked on the basis of one’s religion. Okay, back off the hijack.
No way did Daddy “happen on some damning information about the LDS” thus igniting his daughter’s abduction! It’s a religion, for pete’s sake.
It’s a tragedy that this family is having to deal with. I don’t really have theories.
I’m leaning in the direction of “daughter ran off on her own and it’s gotten out of hand.” Although the OP mentions it in passing as being ruled out, I haven’t yet seen any convincing evidence that she didn’t plan this herself. Barring that, I think the family knows a bit more than they’re letting on.
I found it odd that during the one interview I saw, the father referred to Elizabeth in the past tense. Strange for someone who is ostensibly holding out hope that she’s alive. Then again, I have no idea how I’d react in a similar situation.
I believe this case is getting a lot of publicity ‘cause the circumstances are so very strange/unusual. It’s very , very odd that a child is abducted from the house where she and her parents are sleeping (note, not impossible, but very distinctly odd). I can only think of 3 other cases in recent times (the JonBennet, tho’ she wasn’t taken from the house, Polly Klauss who was abducted from her home during a slumber party by a stranger and the most recent one where the neighbor is on trial).
In home abductions are very risky, especially, one would think, in an upscale neighborhood as in this case.
IIRC, the descriptions of the abductor and the description of the guy sought for questioning are so very very different (the abductor is quite a bit shorter than the guy sought) that it’s unlikely (to me) that he’s the guy.
Another one was the famous abduction of “Baby Sabrina” Aisenberg, here in the Tampa Bay area. That was November 24, 1997. She was 5 months old. Her father left the garage door open. Nobody, including the family dog, heard or saw anything. The police spent a lot of time and effort trying to prove the father killed Sabrina and hid the body. About all they managed to do was ruin their lives. To this day she hasn’t been found.
I just reread my post (yeah, a day later) and I realized I’m a total nonce. I know it was the sister who reported that the abductor was a male. What I meant to say was that I didn’t understand why Shirley seemed to have made a connection between the intruder’s maleness and the possibility of the family secret belonging to the father. wring, are you referring to the Danielle Van Dam case in San Diego?