You forgot to mention balding as part of the reason. Your co-workers obviously didn’t do their research.
Yes, of course.
But I’m not claiming it’s a super-important component. I’m claiming it is likely A component. If it were super-important, identical twins would show more than 52% correlation in sexuality. If it were unimportant, they would likely show the same correlation as fraternal twins. That’s all I’m saying.
The other problem with sexuality is that it does not appear to be binary, or even trinary. I, for example, am in the bisexual range primarily favoring the opposite sex but not averse to same-sex encounters. Other people, I think, tend to occupy various positions in the range, from mid-line bisexual to the monosexual extremes (cf. Kinsey). It seems unlikely that a single coherent gene, or even a discrete group of genes, would be likely to account for this. In the language of programming, genetics appears to be “spaghetti code”, scattershot and interwoven.
Of course, the concept of the Kinsey Scale could be completely off-base, I might well be just an outlier.
This pit was lame. You all suck and butt secks.
It’s weird, really…
Every post clothahump makes shows up on my screen in a series of “hadouken!” and “shoryuken!” just repeated over and over again. I’m not sure if it’s my browser, or what. Does anybody know? I’m using Windows 98 and Netscape Navigator on my AOL dial-up. Could that be it?
Reasoned responses. I don’t care who you are, that’s funny right there. Reasoned responses. :D:D
Allow a gentle refresher:
But you’re disagreeing with him. Therefore your argument is de facto not reasoned.
I have not tried it, but I have heard that Opera on Debian renders his posts as something like “ecki ecki phtang nee-whomp”.
Thank you for reminding me of Dr. Demento. I just found this on youtube because of you.