I don’t think that people are objecting to her being religious as much as they’re objecting to fallacious logic. As has been stated and restated, if God can influence things than he’s to blame for the rape as well as the cop finding her. If God can’t influence things, than there’s no reason to thank him.
That is a good point, she might have. But it wouldn’t change the fallacious nature of thanking God for her rescue.
In a pragmatic sense? Yes, whatever gets her through this tragedy reasonably sane is good. But I’d also wager that there are other coping mechanisms which don’t rely on a God or Gods to work. And, of course, it is still a fallacy to thank God for the good stuff while ignoring the bad.
Not in magnitude, no. But in form? They’re both thanking God for causing a good thing while ignoring God for causing bad things.
Yes and no. It’s easy to make up some mythology to weave some strands together, but that’s not really an explenation especially if it’s got a system of logic that’s full of holes. More to the point…
But that still leaves us right at step one. Why allow a Satan at all? Surely an omniscient being would know someone’s heart. Further, why make such a thing actually happen? Surely an omnipotent God could cause you to have a very very very vidid dream in which you were raped and left for dead to see if you’d still have faith. Heck, this omniscient being could then erase the memory so you’d think you had a good night’s sleep.
This is a bit better, but then it eliminates someone thanking God for good things. After all, if there’s free will then God had nothing to do with it.
Depends on how you define ‘cosmic babysitter’