millroy, you still have not shown that the six-no-wait-five-no-maybe-fewer people in the original thread were responding to the bogus quotations in specific.
Can you do so, or will you simply ignore the issue again?
millroy, you still have not shown that the six-no-wait-five-no-maybe-fewer people in the original thread were responding to the bogus quotations in specific.
Can you do so, or will you simply ignore the issue again?
Go back and read what I posted, milroyj. I ignored december’s little mendacity, completely, and addressed the specific actions of Bush, regardless of any purported quotes in the OP. december constantly whines that people are too caught up in challenging his “sources” and failing to address his ever-so-important questions (that he tags onto his posts to give the appearance of a Great Debate when he posts his glurge in the GD forum), so I did him the courtesy of responding to his actual questions rather than challenging his purported quotes.
Actually, Clinton did ‘take us to war over it’. Nobody remembers Operation: Desert Fox? Just because it didn’t actually accomplish anything (in the long run), doesn’t mean it doesn’t qualify as a shooting war.
Uh huh. Because he made a mistake, the liberals see it as an opportunity to turn the tables on him. But that doesn’t matter really, because they would have found something — something — to use as a means of rationalizing a pile-on complete with demands for discipline and banning. They would have found it simply because he is December. Even Poly falls victim to that sort of mentality from time to time.
I doesn’t go like this: Ah! There’s something wrong. Let me see who this is…
Rather, it goes like this: Ah! This is December. Let me find something wrong…
His joke never stood a chance here. As I explained before, the only jokes that are funny here are those that make fun of God or rednecks. Though they prefer to believe otherwise, liberals are not exempt from prejudicial bias and bigotry.
tomndebb -
I did go back and reread your response. You were obviously responding to the OP, going so far as to give a direct answer to the question december posed. He asked, “Was the President lying or misleading us?” You responded “He lied”.
Claiming that when you posted to a thread, and made a direct response to questions and issues raised by the OP, you weren’t really responding to a thread, is mighty weak.
You fell for it, quite clearly and unambiguously.
“If Clinton says it, it is true. If Bush said it, it is false.” That is what december was trying to demonstrate, and he certainly succeeded.
andros -
Can you prove that I am responding to your post?
Regards,
Shodan
Made a mistake? Deliberately lied is a more accurate description.
What sort of crap is this? When was the last pile on onto Polycarp? I guess your intent is to claim that because Polycarp got unfairly attacked (some time? any time? cite?) december is in some way comparable to the well respected poster Polycarp
It’s more like this:
Ah! There’s something wrong. Ah. It’s a well known lying partisan fucking idiot.
But the other way works well too:
Ah, here’s a post from a noted lying partisan fucking idiot. There must be something wrong with it…
Now this is just wrong, too. I’ve laughed myself silly over jokes about giant squid, 1920s style death rays, all sorts of shit.
Idiot.
Do you not think that the complete context change caused by the “inadvertent” inclusion of the Hillary quote renders the comparison utterly invalid? Do you not think that the level of the administration’s knowledge might change in 5 whole years? I sure as hell do, and for the record I think Clinton is a horrific liar. And shit, you don’t even have a clue what the respondents in question said to Clinton’s comments at the time, so how any conclusions are being drawn from this is just beyond me.
As for Libertarian’s apparent argument that it doesn’t matter if december lies his arse off because “the liberals” would attack him anyway, well, words fail me. That’s pretty desperate.
Then your opinion doesn’t really count, now does it?
tomndebb:
What Shodan said.
:Hands Libertarian a Kleenex:
There, there, dear – it’s not that bad. Stop your weeping.
Daniel
And who is responsible for that reaction? december himself with his cites that are all too often some combination of inaccurate, irresponsible, and flat out wrong.
Aw, crap. Burundi, near as I know, doesn’t get annoyed at Libertarian’s martyr complex, his “Poor, poor me, doomed to be beset on all sides by blasphemers and authoritarians!” routine. That was me handing you a tissue, Lib; my apologies for any confusion.
I missed giving you feedback in the melancholy thread, so here it is: when your melancholia leads you to paranoia, keep it you yourself.
Daniel
Libertarian’s assertion is validated by Demostylus’s post in this thread:
Note that there’s no reference to anything in the post s/he’s responding to, just an attack.
Gather round, my children, and let me tell you the story of the boy who cried Wolfowitz.
Daniel
Note also that December doesn’t quote ElvisL1ves’s post, immediately following, that validates Demostylus’s post, showing that Mister Credibility was indeed launching the same tired and useless lies. It was an attack – but it was an attack in the BBQ Pit, and while it wasn’t properly referenced, it was accurate.
Say what you will, december: demostylus at least got one out of two.
Daniel
Only if you’re working under the mistaken impression that you’re Dumbya and this is the UN.
But since you aren’t and this isn’t, in my perfectly valid opinion, your Fearless Misleader remains a murderous lying Sack 'O Shite, and you continue to prove that you’re nothing but a cumstain.
TTFN
Drag him out and shoot him. I’ll swear out the warrant later.
Actually, it’s as I feared: I’m hardly the first person to make this lame pun. Shoot the others first!
Daniel
Hmm, let me think about this for a sec. Nope, your opinion still doesn’t matter. Thanks for playing, we have some nice parting gifts for you. Or not.
Albeit no doubt unintentionally, that is damn funny. 'cuase, ya know, reading your dribble on this thread, milroy and “thoughtful,” don’t exactly spring to mind.
OTOH, “a load his/her Momma should have swallowed,” often does. Ask Clinton how nasty cumstains can be.
Cheers.
Why is his,Redfury’s(?) opinion not important on this board? That’s the stupidest thing I’ve seen on the board this week. “You can’t have an opinion on American politics because you’re not an American!”