Well, I believe quite a large number of people have asked repeatedly why they should give a rat’s ass about this whole flapdoodle, and the only thing I can figure is that you seem to think Letterman is some sort of recognized spokesperson for the Democratic Party, or Liberalism, or whatever.
Guess we’ll see, won’t we? I for one hope you get many more chances to impress yourself with your clairvoyance. I like to see people happy.
Drooling Palin haters? Crap she is a non entity in the political stream. She fell into the public, revealed herself and was rejected, by dems and repubs alike. A few far righties found something to pretend they liked about her. She is a political joke.
Ah, so you admit this comment - I’m sorry: numerous people have asked on this general theme and haven’t gotten a straight answer yet, so let’s try one more time. From where do you get the curious notion that some late night talk-show host is my personal political spokesperson? - is a bit of a lie? You’ve gone from “numerous people” asking me to you “believe quite a large number of people have asked repeatedly,” huh? And then you try “one more time” to see if you can get a straight answer to a question that nobody has asked me, huh? And instead of me apparently dodging these direct questions, you now “figure” that I “seem to think” Letterman was speaking for you.
That’s some furious backpedaling there. Hope you’re not too tired! :rolleyes:
Boy, that sneaky** El Kabong!**. You really nailed him that time, Stephe. Of course, “el kabong” is Spanish for lying sack. That is, with the “o” ending, el kabongo. With the feminine “a” ending, its “la kabonga” which is douchebag.
But that said, with all due awe, why do you seem to think that this Letterman guy has some kind of status amongst us?
(Hey, El, just bustin’ yer chops a little, OK? Well, maybe a lot, but still…)
Again, and maybe I missed something, but have I ever implied that I thought Letterman was speaking for anyone?
Of course, Dave did have plenty of defenders on this thread; I’m guessing you don’t exactly rush to the defense of someone you really don’t care about.
It’s a good apology. Thorough, abject, unqualified. I personally think it was unnecessary, but there it is. Of course, it won’t be enough because none of those demanding an apology ever really wanted one, because none of them were ever really offended in the first place (including Sarah Palin), but there it is. He groveled. If Palin conitinues to play the martyr (which she will), she’ll look like the asshole, not him.
Now that she has found an issue that resonates with the base, she has a real chance of keeping her name in the news until the 2012 election. If she can get Conan to join the fun, her prospects are unlimited.
Yep, he got me dead to rights. The only possible outcome is that I was lying about his intentions. Can’t imagine how I thought I might sneak that one past him, the clever sod.
But then, I’m a liberal; it’s axiomatic that I’m a lying douchebag.
Leno’s joke explictly targets the 17-yeatr old pregnant daughter, while Letterman’s joke was more ambiguous. He mentions Palin and her trip to the baseball game (which was with her 14-year-old) and jokes about getting pregnant, a pretty clear reference to the 17-year-old. This ambiguity allowed people to claim outrage and insist he was talking about the 14-year-old. Leno avoided that trap.
Heh. Even the San Francisco Chronicle’s far-right-wing columnist Debra J. Saunders today expressed her wish that Sarah Palin would “just go away” and “stop milking her status as GOP martyr.”