I already admitted I was in error. I was unaware that he had once held a minor, insignificant elected position in the lower house of a colonial legislative assembly.
I do not accept your attempts to broaden “political experience” to include anything outside of elected office.
My bad. It was in fact a reply to the previous post in which a faulty recap by **bup **was quoted. My apologies.
You’re not getting that reading a Shayna post gives one no clearer an understanding of the real world than does reading an Ann Coulter column, are you?
He claimed that’s what she did, while ignoring the suggestion that they were filtered, partisan, and off-topic and that she resisted exploring them with vehement personal invective. “Unimpeached” my ass. :rolleyes:
You need to think about it too. Or try to. If you can.
Por nada. It never happened.
Why yes, yes it is. I’ve provided substance with my snark, while you have only snark. And it’s uncreative snark at that, which is the worst kind.
I mean, look at this. What is it with you and the Kool-Ade? Too stupid to think of anything wittier? At least change it up, man! Call me brainwashed, or make some reference to the Obamessiah, or try out some other insults.
Oh, I get it. You’re upset because your mom bought you the Grape Kool-Aid when you really wanted the Blastin’ Berry Cherry, aren’t you?
Care to give us an example?
Where?:rolleyes:
RNATB, click on Search, near the top of the page. Have fun.
This is a gorgeous example of your lack of substance. You refuse to argue, only intimating that you’re right and we’re all Kool-Ade (sic) drinkers for not seeing it. You have nothing. Moon hoaxers have more substance than you do!
Well…
No, actually, I have a better idea. I’ll dismiss your claim out of hand since you have no interest in backing it up.
Aid. It’s spelled Kool-Aid, mallethead.
I have no interest in spoon-feeding you for the sake of your amusement, if that’s what you mean. If you were really interested, you’d have been at least following the primary-season threads in GD last year. But you didn’t, and you’re not, so there’s no reason to trust you’re in good faith with this request.
If that’s not the case, then you can do what I suggest and fucking catch up here.
You claimed to have provided some of your own in this thread, by way of showing (yourself) your own superiority. I simply asked where it is. You obviously can’t show any. All you have is Shaynaesque invective, and, like here, somehow think that’s the same thing. Incredible.
Now lecture us all some more about ad hominems.
And to think, this thread started out being about how LETTERMAN is an asshole!
I followed plenty of them, and saw no evidence of what you suggest. Obviously, Shayna was on Obama’s side- she freely admitted that she was a campaign volunteer. However, when she made a claim she backed it up.
In any case, I can only conclude for now that Algorithm either made a remarkable guess, or was able to predict your actions based on past behavior. I don’t think you’ll be too surprised to hear I’m leaning toward the latter.
Although it was actually FlaVor-Aid they used at Jonestown.
Letterman is an asshole. Sarah Palin is a cloaca.
I do not accept your attempts to restrict “political experience” to include elected office and nothing else. That frankly makes no sense.
In the meanwhile, in another part of town, Letterman’s ratings increased like the libido of a teenager arriving at the beach.
Well, since you’re clearly not old enough to chew your own food, I’ll have to spoonfeed you. (Hint: it’s much easier to go back and read posts from today than it is from 7 months ago.) I’ve even bolded the actual arguments I’ve made, just for you.
Now, being quite serious for the moment:
Shayna’s cites may be problematic. They may not tell the whole story, or they may even be misleading in themselves. They might even directly contradict her because she never learned to read. There might be a million and one problems with her cites.
Here’s the thing: you don’t address the cites at all. All you do is say that since Shayna is clearly drinking the Kool-Ade (sic), her posts can be discounted in their entirety. In doing so, you attack the poster and not her cites, and in doing so, you commit the argument fallacy ad hominem, which is where I originally started attacking you.
Now, are you prepared to put up, or would you like to shut up?
Did he hold any offices to which he was appointed by elected officials?