Fuck Political Correctness.

Ignoring your oddly German sentence structure, I thought your rant was about people who complain because they consider themselves victims of discrimination?

Call away. I stand by my statements.

How do I answer a semantically meaningless rhetorical question? Oh, I know: look here.

Neither, I prefer an Uzi.

  1. White American male = Put upon drama queen psuedo victim
  2. Skutir = White American male
  3. Skutir = Put upon drama queen psuedo victim

Is that the statement you stand by Skutir?

  • Rune

I think it’s unfair and stupid to lump Political Homosexuals and people who want to rename computer drives. If this were a rant about extreme political correctness like people who say “herstory”, I’d be right with the OP. But basic respect for the equality of human beings (i.e. equal rights for homosexuals and women) is not ridiculous or reversed bigotry…it’s progress.

Just like anything else, lumping mainstream in with extreme is a big mistake.

Why not, Winston.

Dig the username, BTW. I love George Orwell.

Well ok then. Any pal of ole George is a pal of mine.

  • Rune

I think it’s unfair to put my name on quotes that aren’t mine!

I too hate political correctness. I also hate having to be civil, respectful, and concerned about other human beings. God, that pisses me off. Almost as much as I hate albinos from Bangladesh with 3 legs and a thumb growing out of your forehead. All of 'em are rat bastards.

eep! sorry skutir. direct all of my ire in Ale’s direction.

[QUOTE=jarbabyj]
I think it’s unfair and stupid to lump Political Homosexuals and people who want to rename computer drives.QUOTE]

Huh?

I mean,

Eh?

I mean, WHAT THE FUCK!??
Where did I lump those thing togheter??? :confused:

Thank you, I just ordered it. I’ll read up and begin realizing how evil I am, along with every other white male in America. Expect a post next week, it will be full of self loathing and generic insults towards those I share skin color and chromosome structure with.

I bow to your advanced thinking, sir!

This is a very stupid thing for a lot of reasons.

  1. Animals are fucking with the planet. Their shit poisons streams. They kill other animals. Their own grazing, according to some, has helped enlarge deserts. Their farts contribute to greenhouse gases. They strip plants of their vegetation. Animals fuck with the planet.

  2. The planet can not be fucked with. The planet was once a hot ball of liquid metal and once it was just a collection of dust. People who think the planet’s optimal state is when its covered with trees and water and furry animals say that because THAT’S WHAT MAKES PEOPLE HAPPY. That is, Lobsang calls humans a disease to the planet because we can destroy that which we like. But that just makes us a disease to our own enjoyment of the planet, BUT NOT TO THE PLANET ITSELF. The planet doesn’t give a shit if every living thing were wiped out tomorrow.

  3. 1 & 2 don’t actually go hand in hand, so pick which ever one you think makes what Lobsang said stupider.

[QUOTE=Ale]

Umm…when you said you disliked PC because it was reverse bigotry, and then used renaming computer drives as an example. Surely you see a huge difference between being hypersensitive about names and fighting for equal rights?

Is what you said exactly. The OP didn’t say fuck “extreme political correctness”, it said FUCK PC, and then listed very NON extreme examples. You listed very extreme examples as being the same thing. That’s not fair.

May I just point out how hilarious I find it that you got offended by a broad generalization about white males in a thread you started about how political correctness is all bullshit?

This is a very stupid thing for a lot of reasons.

  1. Animals are fucking with the planet. Their shit poisons streams. They kill other animals. Their own grazing, according to some, has helped enlarge deserts. Their farts contribute to greenhouse gases. They strip plants of their vegetation. Animals fuck with the planet.

  2. The planet can not be fucked with. The planet was once a hot ball of liquid metal and once it was just a collection of dust. People who think the planet’s optimal state is when its covered with trees and water and furry animals say that because THAT’S WHAT MAKES PEOPLE HAPPY. That is, Lobsang calls humans a disease to the planet because we can destroy that which we like. But that just makes us a disease to our own enjoyment of the planet, BUT NOT TO THE PLANET ITSELF. The planet doesn’t give a shit if every living thing were wiped out tomorrow.

  3. 1 & 2 don’t actually go hand in hand, so pick which ever one you think makes what Lobsang said stupider.

Sarcasm is so witty and you do it so well!!!

YES! POINT IT OUT POINT IT OUT! :: clapping, squealing ::

I’m a little reluctant to get into this car wreck, but:

The deforestation, desertification, and greenhouse gases caused by farm animal populations is hardly the animals’ fault, as I’m sure you must know. It’s not like a bunch of wantonly destructive cows got together and decided to overpopulate themselves so they could be killed and eaten by humans, with reckless regard for the consequences. Selfish, naughty cows!

This comment is like responding to one of those stories about a crazy old women who has 70 malnoursihed cats in her house and faulting the cats!

All right, then. With a big shout out to jarbabyj:

:: takes a deep breath ::

I find it quite hilarious.

Thank you! Peace out!