Fuzzy Wuzzy is going to eat your face off for laughing at him.
:eek: What the fuck is that?
Does the Mail hire English-speaking copy editors? “She lethal claws are clearly visible”? “These is how Dolores would have looked”?
I noticed that as well. I also thought it was odd that it said “Vets have been left baffled by the condition of the bespectacled bear” and “The spectacled bears have a thick, dark coat normally” in another.
Not only that, IMHO (as a non-writer) ISTM it would be less clumsy to have said “This is what a healthy [type of bear] would look like.”
That bear looks like something out of “Where the Wild Things Are.”
Don’t feed the yao guai.
Awww, not so fuzzy!
At first I thought it was a guy in a creature suit.
The BRFO (Bigfoot Field researchers Organization) insisted one mangy bear in Pennsylvania actually was a Squatch.
Same, the rear leg looks like a human knee in a poorly-fitted bearsuit. But the other pictures look genuine. Just an unfortunate angle! And I don’t know about you, but I’m not used to seeing furless burs.
The St. Louis Zoo had a hairless chimp, but it didn’t look much different than one with hair: