He’s just a Johnny come lately…the Tories have been saying that for years.
They don’t. It will be up to the Commons to decide whether to suspend him.
And the Standards and Privileges Committee is hardly an unelected quango - it’s a Commons’ committee of MPs elected by MPs. Specific matters are delegated by the Commons to one of its committees, which then reports back with recommendations. That’s the way the Commons has been conducting business for centuries.
The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards is unelected. But he has no powers, can only make recommendations to the Commons and is answerable to them.
In what forums? The ones devoted to finding ways to justify Bush’s invasion? By finding “evidence” that containment was failing, and that the war was actually the appeaser-collaborators’ fault?
We’re talking about local council elections. Even if you accept the premise that a vote for Labour is a vote for the Iraq war (as opposed to say, a vote for their recycling initiative), Galloway is still presuming to speak for God. It is completely nucking futs to think that at the pearly gates, St Peter will say, “Charity worker, one happy marriage, helped a friend get through depression, but, hey, you voted Labour in a local election - burn, you sick mother, burn”. Introducing this sort of rhetoric into British political discourse is a) offensive, b) a massive retrograde step and c) desperate pandering to radical Islamists. It’s sad, it’s desparate and it’s just wrong.
The Times & The Sunday Times: breaking news & today's latest headlines The evidence is far from overwhelming.
That is one of the most hilarious things I have ever seen!