Topics may be:
Islam, jihad, terrorism, and Islamophobia
Zionism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
The War on Terror, the Iraqi War, the Afghanistan War, and the bombing of North Africa
Iran and nuclear weapons
The Syrian civil war
Racism
Gun violence in the US
US hegemony
I’m pretty sure they’d both claim they’d won.
I’d rather see who’d win in a bareknuckle fight to the death.
Hopefully the roof would cave in.
More a request for opinion, really. Let me move that for you.
George Galloway would win the debate but it wouldn’t be on the subject you started with. He’s a master at answering a question you never asked, he is also a master at being a first class cunt. A cunt of Piers Morgan stature and I don’t make that comparison lightly.
Anyone who didn’t watch.
Regards,
Shodan
Objectively, probably Galloway. He is indeed a first-class cunt but he does his homework and he’s an experienced rhetorical scrapper. He managed to gain the moral high ground in a stand-off with the US Congress, which says a lot about Congress when you lose the moral high ground to pond scum.
But personally I’d be hoping for the roof to fall in too. Even moreso if Piers Morgan is moderating.
I’ve heard Michael Savage on the radio twice and wasn’t impressed.
And I’ve never heard George Galloway speak. I know he’s a left-wing British politician, so I assume I’d agree with Savage more often than with Galloway. But since Savage strikes me as a bit of a jerk, I wouldn’t particularly want him on my side.
It should be noted that Galloway has a policy against sharing stages with Jews and will get up and leave if informed that Michael Savage is one, which I believe he is by ancestry at least.
I had to look up Galloway because I’ve never heard of him before. But Savage, what a piece of work he is. First of all, if he got a PhD from Cal, one would think he has some brains. Listen to his radio show, and you’d never know it. There isn’t a smear against Obama that he isn’t willing to make, there isn’t a rightwing conspiracy theory that he doesn’t buy. I generally listen to a few minutes of his show on my evening commute, up to the point where he says something so insane that I turn him off. Generally I don’t get two blocks. So not knowing Galloway, I give the nod to him based on what I know of Savage.
Galloway is a Muslim supremacist who is most known for being Saddam Hussein’s paid lobbyist in Britain and instigating violence against Jews; even the rest of the extreme left in the UK has had enough of him and found it prudent to declare that he doesn’t speak for their beliefs. Can you just trust that both he and Savage are terrible and not make this about Obama?
Who?
If you mean George Galloway - he’s the impressive orator and Islamist prick accurately described upthread. The best example of his work however is when he appeared on the UK Big Brother dressed in lycra, pretending to be a cat, drinking milk from the hand of Rula Lenska (I may be wrong with the details - my mind has tried to suppress the memory).
But I’m sure it can be found quite easily on t’internet.
No, he has a policy of not sharing stages with Israelis. He is more or less anti-Israel, but swears up and down that he is not anti-Semitic.
No one is obligated to participate in his charade (or to think that discriminating against someone based on nationality is that much better than doing so based on race). George Galloway only exists, politically, as the voice of violent, uncompromising anti-Semitism, and even other people in the anti-Israel movement have come to understand that when he says “Israeli” he means “Jew.”
George Galloway is a Roman Catholic, not a Muslim and not an Islamist. He’s sympathetic to various Islamic causes because a good portion of his constituency in Yorkshire was of Subcontinental origin, but I doubt he personally, in his heart of hearts, cares all that much about Islam.
This is not true. George Gallowayconverted to Islam in 2000. He is, most certainly, an Islamist – a person who believes that a conservative form of Islam should be imposed as law on everyone. That is the only reason he exists in politics. He has no supporters other than Muslim fanatics and no causes other than “behead those who insult Islam/ death to the Jews.” Saying Galloway isn’t an Islamist is like saying Mao isn’t a Communist; it makes no sense that you can even know who the person is without being aware of this fact.
By the way:
George Galloway is from Scotland. After he converted to fanatical Islam, he went looking for a constituency with a Jewish MP and a substantial population of radicalized Muslims so that he could run the sort of shit-stirring campaign he dreamed of. He moved into Bradford for this reason – you have the order of causation backwards.
Oh, you mean *Michael *Savage. Not Dan. That changes things slightly.