As you may be awa
How dare you imply that I am an awa!
This thread is totally awa!
Michael Savage is an ultra-conservative nut-job. Beyond that, there isn’t much to tell.
Plus, he assassinates people who inquire too closely about him. Look at poor Angry Lurker - he didn’t even get off a whole post before it was too late !
The OP may have started this thread because of the news that Savage has been banned from entering the UK because of his views.
Michael Savage has been banned from entering the UK.This puts him in the company of Fred Phelps - which says it all really.
Well, that’s sad, really. It looks like Britain is returning to the days of Henry VIII, when disagreeing with the king was intolerable.
That’s absurd. He’s no more objectionable than, say, Sebastian Horsley.
Weiner. Michael Weiner, apparently.
Well, to be fair, Sebastian Horsley was banned from the US not for his views, but instead for his booze (well, actually the cocaine and heroin convictions, but that doesn’t rhyme as well.)
I think the fact that out of the many billions of people in the world we Brits find only 22 objectionable makes us pretty damn tolerant.
I’d say Ann Coulter caught a break.
Prove it by letting in Savage, Coulter, Limbaugh, and Phelps, then.
(To everyone else: After Tagos lets those in, run up behind him and slam the door so they can’t get back out.)
He says he is going to sue Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary for things she said about him outside of parliament. A British lawyer on BBC Five Live this morning said he has a very good chance of winning and getting about £200,000. The lawyer said, with the legal costs, this could cost her personally about £750,000.
Perhaps he was dictating.
It’s more than 22 people. Savage is repugnant, but some of the people on the list appear to have actually done something, but even those who haven’t sound like they are worse than he is.
Is there any chance of getting Jacqui Smith banned from the UK too?
Togos said ‘tolerant’ not ‘completely stupid’.