What?!? You have failed to answer any of the questions posed to you, and you accuse others of not addressing arguments? Good lord this is one of the worst cases of projection I’ve seen on this board in a while. Is self reflection so hard for you that you’d rather do … whatever this is that you’re doing instead?
Your actual argument that if you ignore all the evidence, Dunn shouldn’t have been convicted? Let me address that now: you’re an idiot.
Just because you don’t like my answers doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
I’m addressing your arguments – why do you accuse Davis of criminal behavior? What do you base this on?
If I jaywalk and some old white man yells at me not to do it, and I ignore him> THUG!!! (depending on skin tone though)
His actions. I’ve already answered that question. You don’t like my answer. Tough.
If you’re blocking his car, definitely. Regardless of skin tone. Or age, race, or gender of the complainer.
Then you can shoot him. 
What actions were criminal? You haven’t provided any evidence that Davis performed a criminal act.
Liar.
No u 
Cite, then. Back up your claim. What actions did Davis take that were criminal? What crime did he commit?
Wait, what?
Why is the idea of an affirmative defense “hideously immoral”?
Makes it too difficult to get away with murder.
Because it requires people to prove their innocence.
Done that already. You replied to the posts. Is there something wrong with your memory?
nm, nm, nm
.
No you didn’t, liar. You’re lying, you lying liar. You provided no cite that Davis broke any laws, liar.
It’s looking like that “epic asshole” nomination is well deserved.
That you think that is very nearly proof beyond reasonable doubt that I’m entirely correct.
Uh huh. Like I told Smapti, when 3 people tell you you’re drunk, it’s time to lie down. Also, try to stop being a racist.