Yay for us!! Go, good guys!! (Wish we were so successful in real-world politics.)
You might be speaking of me, but I’ll just turn the other cheek. 
I don’t think he was - he was perhaps referring to the game immediately before this one (or just past games in general). Anyway I was impressed with your play in that you went ahead and participated while I was sometimes too scared to post something that might sound dumb or scummy. You threw yourself in the deep end while I poked at the water with my big toe.
ETA: and even though I was cautious I said both dumb and scummy sounding things!
Everyone should have been sure I was Town: If I ever do get a Scum role I’ll be the guy cringing catatonically in the corner. :smack:
Suburban is that actually the second time you’ve been lynched in part for something you did prior to joining the scum team? (At least the last time you were technically scum at the time!)
I’m amused that Mahaloth’s lack of directness on vig-protecting pedescribe was what got Astral killed. All of Town’s disorganization and miscommunications ended up helping us!
I wasn’t direct?
Indirect - vote pedescribe
Direct - I would like the vig and doc to target pedescribe
No, not really. It would have been more direct if you had specifically typed:
“The vig and doc should both target Pedescribe tonight”.
Worked out okay, and it was clear enough, but it was a bit short of 100%.
ETA - sniped by sach.
As vanilla town, I was happy to die for my team.
Ah, I guess. I thought that my big, bolded, comment about voting pedescribe was clear.
Especially with the timing of it.
I gotta figure out some way to better hide my mason-hood, I see. What tipped you guys off?
Probably just vote analysis. Masons don’t generally throw their partners under the bus like Scum do (nor, I think, should they), so once one’s out, it’s generally pretty easy to find the others.
There had to be more to it than just votes - I checked the votes and neither Ed nor Zer had voted for Maha - but I guess Ed must have expressed suspicion of him or something.
Pretty much what Chronos said. Once Maha had claimed we went back over his votes and votes on him to exclude some players. Then looking through his posts we saw you as the likeliest fellow-mason (#147, #181, #220, #246, #293/298/305). By process of elimination we came up with Wanderers as the probable last mason based on your interactions with other players. Didn’t help us much.
Monks tend not to vote for each other.
Sorry for the M5 flashback.
Oh, so it wasn’t me, it was Maha? I thought my “vote once a day, stick to it like a great white attacking a cooler full of pork butts” strategy would mitigate my apparent mason-hood. =P
You’re looking not just for one person who hasn’t voted for another person, you’re looking for a set of three people who all haven’t voted for each other, even when other folks are voting for them. Even without one being outed, you can see patterns in this, and eventually find the masons. It’s just that, usually, by the time the Scum could figure it out, it’s about time for the masons to be claiming, anyway.
The next game on my boards is being run by JSGoddess and it will be a Scooby Doo themed mafia. Sign ups are here.