My Beloved.
When will wealthy industrialists stop commissioning Diego Rivera to make murals??
At the absolute latest, November 24, 1957.
Shit, I thought those were his psychedelic surfboards!
This is probably the right place to link to Glenn Beck remixed .
Nametag
September 5, 2009, 6:00pm
87
No, you fool, they’re discarded Beck lyrics! It’s all connected, can’t you see?!
Had to post this -
Charlie Brooker 's take on him
Another great example of independent consensus-challenging news coverage is America’s Fox News network, home of bellicose human snail Bill O’Reilly and blubbering blubberball Glenn Beck. Beck - who has the sort of rubbery, chucklesome face that should ideally be either a) cast as the goonish sidekick in a bad frat house sex comedy or b) painted on a toilet bowl so you could shit directly on to it - has become famous for crying live on air, indulging in paranoid conspiracy theorising, and labelling Obama a “racist” with “a deep-seated hatred for white people or white culture”.
As a news source, Fox is about as plausible and useful as an episode of Thundercats. Still, at least by hiring Beck, they’ve genuinely challenged the stuffy consensus notion that people should only really be given their own show on a major news channel if they’re sane.
The trouble is, once you’ve gasped or chuckled over the YouTube clips of his most demented excesses, he’s actually incredibly boring: a fat clown with one protracted trick. His show consists of an hour of screechy, hectoring bullshit: a pudgy middle-aged right-winger sobbing into his shirt about how powerless he feels. It’s an incredible performance, but it belongs in some kind of zoo, not on a news channel.
source Charlie Brooker's screen burn | James Murdoch | The Guardian
Has anyone noticed that the UK media is far more likely to mention someone’s weight than the US media is? Or, at least, be more brazen about it. Over here, someone might say Beck is ‘rotund’ or ‘doughy’ while over there it wouldn’t be surprising to read ‘he could lose about 60 pounds.’
I think fatness is too sensitive a subject here, perhaps.
wierdaaron:
Has anyone noticed that the UK media is far more likely to mention someone’s weight than the US media is? Or, at least, be more brazen about it. Over here, someone might say Beck is ‘rotund’ or ‘doughy’ while over there it wouldn’t be surprising to read ‘he could lose about 60 pounds.’
I think fatness is too sensitive a subject here, perhaps.
Here it would be too likely a case of the pot calling the kettle black, since 99% of us are overweight, too.
Why must EVERYTHING be about race???
wierdaaron:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szlLM5lCNJg
If you watch that entire video without dying, you win a prize: insanity.
I pit anybody who can defend that video as anything but utter, complete, raving horse shit.
ggg…uuuurrrgggghhh… duhhhh…
Hungry and eat doggie food
(Get over here .)
Hamlet:
Pink Floyd?
We don’t need no hemophiliacs
Incitatus?
No, wait, that was debunked. Never mind.
I don’t know about sex comedy, but now that you mention it, he does have that Biff Tannen asshole kind of face that you want to slug.
Cisco:
:eek: That’s what Charles Darwin looks like?
:rolleyes:
You know, there is a possibility that anybody is wrong about any given thing, but I kind of doubt it in this case. And if he was wrong, it certainly wasn’t because didn’t know what Charles freakin’ Darwin looked like. If there is a better argument than “he looks like Darwin” out there, I’ll gladly accept it. Until then, I’ll believe the guy with the PhD in hispanic studies.
I don’t know if this is a better argument, but:
These people use this image to ask you to find Charles Darwin in this mural . (Careful: pretty big image and international marxism involved). :o
I’m convinced.
Cisco:
Mea culpa, mea culpa. I have stayed in touch with that professor and I just emailed him and got a quick response. I must’ve been misremembering what he said, or perhaps he misunderstood my question that day.
Didn’t see this post. Never you mind.
Sampiro:
Actually I thoughtOlbie was great in slamming this , especially when he points out that Beck himself also works in Rockefeller Center.
So the Rockefellers, by some accounts the first billionaires in U.S. history and a family that contributed Republican politicians, were really Commies.
American Heritage magazine did something about ranking the richest American by with respect to GDP (I think it was the Oct '98 issue). Rockefeller was by and far the richest guy–I can’t remember the exact number but based on today’s GDP its peak worth would have been roughly $325 billion. Tight-wad commies, if you ask me.
