Don’t be silly. I’m having fun because I enjoy the give-and-take of a spirited debate.
The question I posed was simple and straightforward and was prompted by revelations FL volunteered in her posts; it was not my intent to anger anyone. I continue to be bemused by the controversy my query has engendered. I never would have guessed it would do so. Moreover, I remain curious: Why would FL engage in coitus with, and thereby risk being impregnated by, a man she knew was a good for nothing bum?
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Yeah, if anyone has some tips, don’t hold out on me.
This, from a person who was shocked to learn that most African Americans are the descendents of slaves.
raises hand
Because he’s hot.
You are conflating “debate” with “excoriation”.
No one is debating here. You are repeating yourself and most people are telling you that you are a jerk.
A few people are mentioning they wondered why Roxy brought the pregnancy to term, too. There aren’t many things I cannot imagine saying, but asking that question is one of them.
So I hit a nerve? Gotcha. However, do tell what your purpose/point is in butting in on conversations just to drop insult bombs?
It’s a question I’ve wondered about in many cases - I guess young women think they can change a man. Or they are so desperate for a baby they’ll screw anything. But then to marry him?
You sir are on the same level as so many others. I wasn’t shocked to learn that, I admitted to not knowing it, and once I checked around some, I believed it. FAR more than most in here will do. Plus, during my checking about I discovered that most people my age or older didn’t know it either. Like me, they had assumed that there had been far more immigration than there had been, and it wasn’t something that we learned in school way back when. It’s still a big so what tho.
Which of course is immaterial to this or any discussion. Same question to you as to kambuckta. I’m betting there is no answer other than you are just a jerk.
You seem to want to make sure that people are answering your questions, mind answering mine from earlier? I’ll repost it here:
What do you want from her now besides just harping on her previous mistake? Why does it need to be brought up over and over and over again as if there is anything to be done about it now?
I did answer it you twit - I told you that I was answering someone’s question about why gms453 asked the question he did in the other thread, with guesses of my own. But of course you had to jump in with both feet and (willfully?) misunderstand.
As for what does it have to do with today? Not a lot, tho women are still having babies sired by men they know are bums, assholes, felons and tea drinkers. People tend to get curious about that, which is what I think gms453’s motivation was. It’s not like the OP in the other thread was asking for advice or dealing with a problem - she was gloating about being able to divorce her husband without having to pay him anything. Yes she made a mistake 16 (?) years ago but the why of it is still interesting today, in a general sense. Why do so many women have babies sired by totally wrong men? Anyone who is hypersensitive to that question probably has motives not visible from the surface. Why are you?
Wow, you really are a nasty old crone. I didn’t call you names but you have to start with the insults? Seriously, are you always this hateful or has someone in this thread honestly said something to make you this way? Or is this really how you usually are? I remember defending you a few times in pit threads about kids but I’m starting to get where the hate comes from.
Also, you don’t get how forums work, do you? You try to pretend I’m wrong for jumping in “with both feet” and at kambuckta for “butting in” on a conversation as if that’s not what is done here. If you want to have a private conversation, take it to PMs. What’s funny is that you’re such a hypocrite about it. I didn’t jump into a conversation with you. YOU addressed ME first here, not the other way around. Post #73, ya dried up old bitch.
And it’s hilarious to me that you of all people are categorizing her divorcing her husband and not having to pay him anything as a bad thing. He lived off of her for 16 years so he got his payments up front instead of at the end of the marriage. At least you finally admit that her choice to marry him and have a child then doesn’t have a lot to do with now yet here you are getting every dig in you can. Something tells me you need more to do with your time. I know you say you’re too disabled to work, but maybe a hobby that doesn’t require you to judge strangers over things you know nothing about?
And then you wonder why you get no respect.
Sorry, I’ll try to be gentler with you from now on.
I am; it’s you and the other name callers who aren’t.
No, I don’t and I have no reason to.
[QUOTE=gms453]
I continue to be bemused by the controversy my query has engendered.
[/quote]
Fret no longer.
Your concern is misplaced: bemusement in no way connotes fretting. Look’em up.
Did anyone ever convince you that you were wrong about something simply by calling you a name?
I haven’t called anyone a good for nothing bum; that’s what FL called her husband. I just asked her why, if she knew he was a bum from the gitgo, she allowed him to impregnate her?
gms is probably not a troll.
gms is definitely a proudly, willfully, smug asshole.
There is a difference.
True.
Cites?
Obviously.
Thanks for the laugh. How about you go back to post 74 and tell me if that was meant with love and respect? Plus, I call you a twit and you think that means it’s OK for you to escalate to “nasty old crone”, “hateful”, etc? I really hope you don’t think “twit” is on the same level…
Ah, so after twit, “dried up old bitch” is OK now? Shrug. As for knowing how forums work, it’s you who either don’t know how they work, or just cannot keep up. As I explained, you didn’t understand the context of what you quoted and so, er, jumped in with both feet and sunk all the way to the bottom.
And yet, it’s OK for you to hasten to judgement? I haven’t categorized anyone, I’ve merely put forth guesses as to what it is that gms453 was asking. As for him “living off of her”, do we even know that? What dig am I getting in? I said that many people don’t understand how women can keep having babies sired by men they know are bums - the OP of the other thread said up front that she knew the guy was a bum, you want us to just ignore that? It’s OK for people to get on her for gloating about her pre-nup, but no one can even ask about why she got herself into this in the first place?
Really, you are being extremely hypersensitive here. Way back there in post 73, all I did was give you an alternate interpretation of what someone else said, and you go off with all that snide crap about her dropping to her knees and time machines and whatever else. I call you a twit for demanding an answer I already gave and you go off with all the insults above. I don’t know what your underlying issues are, but you’ve created a huge bruhaha out of nothing.
Bemused: Puzzle, confuse, or bewilder.
Fret not: Don’t worry.
I’m bemused by your apparent inability to discern the difference in meaning of those two words. While there’s no reason for me to fret about that, perhaps you should.
You’re missing the second order signifiers of bemused.
Why did you kick this smoldering turd back up to the top of the pile?
Shit! Now I did it.
and it won’t come off my shoe either