Okay, in that case, how do you know that one exists, if you don’t know what it is?
He has found a non-constructive existence proof. No doubt a truly miraculous one, which unfortunately is too big to fit in this thread.
Well I see they made the change. I like it. It was a good concession without actually changing anything. And it makes sense.
I’m just worried Q.E.D.'s head is going to start inflating like his post count.
…in the span of 26 minutes? 
Speaking as a wordsmith, I vote against “Factual Questions.” I prefer the OP’s original title, “GQ with Factual Answers,” because the phrase “Factual Questions” is somewhat…contra-factual, shall we say.
A *question *can’t be factual. It is a question. The *answer *can be factual.
My suggestion, as a professional wordsmith, for an alternate name for GQ? It’s…
…ummmm…
…can I get back to you on that?
Thanks.
Yes.
But that’s exactly what “factual questions” means.
Just like in “computer questions”: Neither the question nor the answer is a computer. Rather, they are questions relating to computers, and everyone seems to understand it that way.
A “factual questions” is a question pertaining to matters of fact, rather than, say, matters of opinion.
<< A “factual questions” is a question pertaining to matters of fact, rather than, say, matters of opinion.>>
…which would be an opinonated question?
Similarly with a trivia question, a moral question, an ethical question, a legal question, a subordinate-clause question, an existential question, etc. Hence, an inquiry about knights searching for the Holy Grail would be a quest question.
This one is my favorite so far. “Factual Questions” indeed!