chrisk
May 8, 2008, 12:00am
321
ArizonaTeach:
You know what, let’s give it a go. Form an alliance…50% each, if it’s allowed. I’m not exactly sure how it’d work out in the end, but I think that the possibility is far too intriguing to pass by.
chrisk , may we form an alliance?
Oh, and sinjin and I are still waiting for our looks at scrolls 2 and 19.
Rules PM-ed.
For the alliance… I think it should be alright. So you’re merging into a partnership where either of you has full trading authority. At the end of the game, you’ll dissolve the partnership on a fifty fifty basis, which implies that if you have more than twice as much loot as anybody else in the game, you’ll tie for the win.
Okay, I’ll start playing around with the tracking software so that I can be sure it’ll handle the transition. Let me know if you’re okay with the terms as I’ve summarized them here.
I am good with that - although I recommend that any trade has to be approved by both members. Is that acceptable, phi ?
And Oredigger …that’s…interesting…! I think we’re definitely gonna be doing business after that’s verified!
By the way I screwed up saying 10 it was really rule 15 I haven’t seen 10.
sinjin
May 8, 2008, 12:47am
324
Then perhaps you will feel more comfy about a trade.
sinjin
May 8, 2008, 12:50am
325
sinjin#5: Meeko I will give you a look at rule 2 for a look at any rule I haven’t seen or have. Repeated to use the right tags. :smack:
Meeko
May 8, 2008, 12:56am
326
sinjin
Holds scrolls: 2, 4, 16, 16
Has seen scrolls: 3, 6, 14, 15, 17, 18
The Above is correct, right?
If that is indeed the case:
Accept – I will LOOK at rule 2 for a LOOK at rule 1
sinjin
May 8, 2008, 12:58am
327
sinjin#5 withdrawn to be more specific
sinjin#6: Meeko, look at my scroll #2 for a look at your scroll #1 , 10 or 21
sinjin
May 8, 2008, 1:00am
329
Well you beat me to it, that works
Meeko
May 8, 2008, 1:03am
330
Are we forming Teams now?
Especially if we are forming Teams, I will wait till next Inventory update before I continue.
Arizona, Did you see
Meeko Offer 20
Arizona Teach any or all of the following:
1 gold for look at 19
1 gold for look at 20
1 platnium for look at 22
?
sinjin
May 8, 2008, 1:04am
332
So Meeko as I understand it since we have an agreement we can each pm each other and Chrisk with our scrolls, since he is off line. Is that your understanding. Any others have input?
Meeko
May 8, 2008, 1:07am
333
I will be the first to agree that doing this in a bulletin board format has its plusses and minuses.
I would love to play this game in person, in real time.
I just got home from work. … All of this is news to me.
chrisk
May 8, 2008, 1:09am
334
ArizonaTeach:
I am good with that - although I recommend that any trade has to be approved by both members. Is that acceptable, phi ?
And Oredigger …that’s…interesting…! I think we’re definitely gonna be doing business after that’s verified!
Yes, requiring both players to sign off on a trade is possible too. I’d rather you stick with whatever protocol you start with, though.
Please come up with a team name that I can use in updates ASAP.
ArizonaTeach , glad you liked the idea! Question though, are we merging inventories, and if so, can you PM me what you know?
all my offers have been withdrawn
chrisk
May 8, 2008, 1:10am
336
I’m here for a bit yet. Looks of rule 1 for rule 2, yes?
Meeko
May 8, 2008, 1:15am
339
phi2dao:
ArizonaTeach , glad you liked the idea! Question though, are we merging inventories, and if so, can you PM me what you know?
all my offers have been withdrawn
Likewise
I withdraw all open offers.
chrisk
May 8, 2008, 1:15am
340
sinjin:
yes
pm-ed.
By the way, I’ll be attending an offsite meeting and training session tomorrow, so will be without a net connection for quite a lot of the day. Will try to let you know before I leave, (should be around 10am EDT,) and you should all take care to haggle nicely when I’m gone.