Happy now Clothahump?

First, I’d appreciate it if you’d respond to these twoposts.

Seeing as how they were earlier than the posts you responded to I’m sure that you read them and only forgot to respond to the data by accident.

Oh, and, on the topic of illegal immigration:

[

](http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0501/03/ldt.01.html)

Personally, just to throw all my cards onto the table face up, I consider this to be somewhere between an act of economic terrorism and outright war; a slowmotion invasion aided by the Mexican government. I, personally, am not even sure that I would have much of a problem with there being a shoot-on-sight policy along our borders at any place other than a legal crossing point, but the jury’s still out. I do support the right of asylum for those fleeing other countries, and believe that we should accept as many immigrants as is economicaly benifical for our nation.

I believe that anybody, of any race, creed, nationality, etc… who tries to enter our country illegally is guilty of undermining the safety and security of the American people. If they then use a deadly weapon with malicious intent upon a LEO guarding our borders, I have no sympathy for them, at all. None. Sure, investigate the shooting. But as far as I’m concerned if you’re in the process of violating the borders of the United States (alone or in a group), and use lethal force on a border guard, your life is forfeit. Even if you try to escape after using lethal force.

Now…

Response the first
Translation: why isn’t the US government effective and highly responsive to the will of the people?
Response: ~snerk~

Response the second
[

](http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/back704.html)
Swing and a miss, eh? Personally I wouldn’t have much problem with effective enforcement of current laws on the books combined with increased security at the borders.

You misspelled “…are equally guilty and should be dealt with as well.”

Ironic, then, that you’re calling for an increased crackdown on US businesses rather than for Mexico to fix its economy… if you honestly care about the drive that motivates people living in poverty to look for a better life.

Billions in tax free greenbacks sent to Mexico?

[

](Hispanic Youth Dropping Out of U.S. Schools | Pew Research Center)

Which human rights, exactly, are we talking about?

No, only deportation and/or arrest, but I’d rather my tax dollars didn’t go towards supporting an illegal immigrant in prison.

Oh, and, rocks?

[

](http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/08/25/D8C71P6O0.html)

CBE is correct, here. Ancedotally, I have heard of far more issues with canada and terror. The Millenium plot, for one.

Well, that’s what I get for trying to suspend my belief that you are a nothing but another dumb Mexican with no respect for laws or a country’s sovereignity and giving you a chance to expand on particular points you’ve made. So be it.

Look shithead, I asked you a question based on a comment you made regarding Mexico requesting that we change our immigration policy towrd Mexico. Mexico can ask for whatever the fuck they want. But our immigration policy should be set by what would benefit the U.S., not your corrupt shithole. Or any other. So they request, we say no, then what? Demand? And with what to back it up such demands? Rocks?

And now catapults? :eek: If you weren’t so fucking stupid and your country so fucking barbaric, that would actually be funny. But it’s not.

So go swallow another bottle of tequila then shove the bottle up your ass,

Or vice versa.

Anecdotally? Could it not be that Canada keeps better records? Like, “oh shit, we let so-and-so through six months ago and turns out he was Al Qaeda.” Whereas Mexico is all, “Al Qaeda? No Al Qaeda has gotten into the US via Mexico! Why, we let millions of illegals pass into the US ever year and… and… never mind.”

And, heck, while I’m at it, about that guide…

[

](http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0501/03/ldt.01.html)

Kinda surreal, no? Who needs to be told that throwing rocks is provocative? Just how stupid is the target audience for this guide? Is there anywhere in the world where hurling a rock at someone’s head isn’t considered to be provocation?

Getting to the US from Honduras is very difficult. I know this because I have a good friend from an unpopular country who really really wanted to visit Disneyland but couldn’t get a US visa. I am pretty well informed about this particular route in tot he US.

Ten years ago it was tough but possible. In recent years Mexico has really tightened the Guatemala border (they have their own illegal immigrant problems) and a whole industry of thieves, murderers, scammers and worse have sprung up along the immigration routes to prey on fleeing Central Americans. These are some of the baddest bad guys in Mexico. For all of Al Qaeda’s planning, this is a long, strenuous and danger-filled journey that many don’t survive. Just about any other plan they could come up with would be a better one than this.

Anyway, a couple months ago I was waiting at a bus stop and some punk kid started throwing rocks at me. I was well on my way to dialing the police when my ride came. It never dawned on me to shoot the guy.

You put you finger directly on the problem. Mexico has a population crisis, and President Fox’s solution is to export up to a quarter of the population to the United States. Recently, units from the Mexican army have been posted along the border with the United States. Their job is not to intercept the flow of people who are trying to cross into the US illegally, unless these people are heading for a section of the border that happens to be patrolled at the moment, meaning they are likely to get caught. At this point the army does intercept the illegals…and buses them to a portion of the border that is not heavily patrolled. Mexico doesn’t want to stop these people from leaving, they are Mexico’s second most valuable “export”. Mexican illegals in America pump 16 billion dollars into the Mexican economy annually, the only other commodity that makes Mexico more money is oil. Thinking that Mexico is going to do anything at all about this problem is madness. It is in every way beneficial to Mexico.

I feel the same way. Let’s see how long it takes CB to call you a racist. Bet he glosses right over the “any race, creed, nationality” part.

I’ll give you the answer to the question of why the Govt doesn’t do anything effective in one word: Florida. Recent elections have been so close, and Florida has paid such a pivotal role in deciding which way they went, that neither side is going to piss off the sizable block of Hispanic voters there, a block that can swing the state one way or the other. Both sides are afraid that effective, determined policing of our borders would do just that-and throw the Hispanic block of votes into the other side’s camp, tilting the balance of national elections for years to come. Hopefully whoever is elected President in '08 will win by a comfortable majority and will feel comfortable confronting the problem of illegals head on instead of this pussyfooting all around the issue that we have now.

Gah! Can a friendly passing Mod remove that period from in front of the second end quote please?

US Navy Admiral Thomas Keating who is in the American in charge of Northern Command said less than one month again in an interview with an American newspaper:

"* **we are unaware, totally, zero, *as to knowledge of terrorists using that avenue to infiltrate the United States of America. We’re just as concerned about the Canadian border. "

“* That is to say, we’re unaware of any terrorists who are using that method of getting into the United States. We have no indication, zero indication, that the terrorists have used that as a method of entry into the United States.*”

Here’s the link: Keating interview

So if this is untrue I’d say you have serious problems with the people running national security.

Give me some cites asshole. And please don’t post any bullshit from one of those far right, white supremacist blog cum “news” blogs.

You are truly fucking psycho.

How about all you fine red blooded 'mercans explain to me why you want Mexico to stop the freedom of movement of its own citizens within its own borders or help the US in any way to deal with the immigration problem but when I made a post explaining a proposal by the Mexican government for a solution Mexico gets accused of “dictating” policy to the US? Anyone who says this isn’t hypocrosy is a moron.

Damn, you’re right. That was really dumb of me to leave out the obvious third option. Since you already have your head up your ass, you can insert the bottle and drink at the same time. How could I have missed that?! :smack:

Link

Dude, he’s NORAD. He can tell you terrorists aren’t flying across the US-Mexico border. He can tell you the Russians and Chinese aren’t flying across our border. He can tell space aliens aren’t flying across our border. What’s that got to do with the millions of undocumented illegals walking across the border? The Border Patrol can’t even tell us how many are crossing, who they are, or what they’re smuggling in. What makes you think NORAD can?

This guy makes me feel all warm and cuddly. The terrorists aren’t flying TU-95 Bear bombers across our borders. That’s nice.

Who’s dodging questions now? #373 and #374

It’s obvious you didn’t read the link which really shows what a close-minded moron that you really are.

“Keating’s Northern Command is the headquarters responsible for defending the continental United States against any external or internal threat, included that from terrorism.

Yep I bet they keep the man with all of that responsibilty outside the loop when it comes to intelligence sharing. Of course American intelligence sure hit the nail on he head when it came to Iraq’s WMD, so you may have a point.

It seems that you have now forgotten, by accident I am sure, to respond to these three posts

And just because worldnet daily isn’t always seen as a great cite:

[

](http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back803.html)

[

](http://tancredo.house.gov/press/press_blog.shtml)

Again this is a silly little sidestepping debating tactic. The issue is not that the Mexican military is not actively stopping illegals, but that they, and the Mexican government, are helping them. You can understand the difference, yes?

Well you never addressed the more civil questions:
Like mine asking politely for some details to the Spanish post you made or FinnAgain’s

Maybe is you want to exchange ideas you could start by address some of the more polite posts.

I’m leaving soon, but if you get a chance to provide the details of the spanish article I will read them later this weekend and hopefully give a fair answer.

Jim

You are.
You asked for and got a cite and then didn’t respond to the assertion.

:rolleyes:
Google “Office of Special Plans cherrypick”, or read this.