Is “ethically handicapped” a protected class?
I agree in that, if he wins, Walker shouldn’t be mocked directly.
But I do think that every elected official who supported him should be asked to explain every weird thing he says while in office. Make them own the fact that they supported a mentally ill person for the Senate out of purely partisan interests.
They don’t have any problem with this. For them, it’s a feature, not a bug.
Don’t they already have Tommy Tuberville in the the Senate on the Republican side? I don’t know if he’s mentally ill, but I thought he was recognized as unqualified.
Tom Cotton
Roy Blunt
Raphael
Tim Scott
John Kennedy
Rand Paul
Ron Johnson
Mike Crapo
Joni Ernst
a tiny sample of how low the Rs are good with going
Every time I hear Roy Blount on Wait Wait I have to remember there’s no relation to him.
I had to double-check and fix my spelling before posting.
There’s a lot of generic idiots in the GOP, but they largely keep their mouths shut most of the time.
Walker, however, is a Celebrity Idiot. There’s no way he’s going to keep his mouth shut when there’s cameras and microphones about. Wanting to be famous is inherent in his personality.
It’s not about them. It’s about everyone who voted for them. Put the politicians in the hot seat, and maybe their voters will start to finally see what they’re all about.
Even a small percentage change can make a difference in a lot of cases.
Probably a prudent strategy…
https://twitter.com/pete_fuller_ga/status/1597256692403646464
Wow. I don’t recall seeing anything like that in previous elections.
Put a check next to the R! Please ignore the candidate!
pronounced “arrrrr”
Wouldn’t the PC term be “ethics-divergent”?
That doesn’t sound PC to me. Maybe “differently-ethicked?”
“Ethically Enhanced”, surely?
Ethical diversity.
Ethically Special.
Ethically challenged?
Republicans probably want it to be. Hell, they probably think that enforcing laws is restraint of trade.