Hey Urbanredneck, stop slobbering over boobs. And no, real men don’t

I don’t get this part:

I read the posts but didn’t notice any of these errors.

Little known fact: flat-chested breasts are part of an enormous breast that you can only see a tiny part of.

I get those two constantly confused with Bricker and Shodan. They all may as well be the same person.

I’ve wondered if they are. But they are different kinds of stupid. Aceplace is more the “golly gee willickers, look at the big scary world” type of small minded douche and Urbanfucktard is more arrogant in his idiocy. There are subtle differences.

Aceplace and UrbanNumbNuts should be in a sitcom where they are roommates and live in NYC and all sorts of hijinks occur.

Nonsense - one is a narrowly legalistic, pettifogging, sarcastic ass with delusions of grandeur. Bricker is the other.

Regards,
Shodan

Well if it’s for science…from this site: Bra Size Calculator - Perfect Fit Every Time in 3 Easy Steps - Bra Space

My band size is 33, cup size 38-38.5.

Well played, Una Persson.

I just wandered over from the thread in Cafe Society to post this scene from IAMMMMW because Terry-Thomas says it so much better than I can.

The trait of Urbanredneck that I find most ridiculous, and there are many to choose from, is his evident belief that feminist men aren’t “real” men, they are limp-dicked wusses. On behalf of my feminist and perfectly real-man husband (not to mention all the other feminist real men I know), I’d like to protest this annoyingly inaccurate characterization.

Also, I have small boobs. (Which Urbanredneck would probably see as proof of his real-men-aren’t-feminists theory: a real man would want a bigger-boobed wife, so of course I ended up with a feminist man, amirite?) And as a modestly endowed female, I assure you there are plenty of men whose primary source of visual arousal is something else, such as legs. In my heyday I never had trouble attracting a man. Sure, I didn’t get attention from the one’s who insist on significant boobery, but there were lots of men who found a petite shape plenty attractive.
.

He posts that stupid bra-size joke in every thread about bras, despite being warned about it every time. And it’s not even funny.

He reminds me of a slightly more intelligent version of Wildest Bill.

It’s probably not a surprise to some people that I tend to get wound up about misogyny and objectification :slight_smile: but urbanredneck has always struck me as completely inconsequential. I see who the poster is, roll my eyes, scroll. He’s always seemed ignorant in an I-don’-need-no-book-larnin’ mouth-breathing kind of way. Yawn.

Exactly. I always think of him as a less intelligent Cletus.

As for “feminist” men being wusses - man it’s the total opposite for me. A man who knows that men and women are equal and is comfortable with his sexuality is a huge turn on. Some big, stupid man who always “jokes” about big boobs and “make me a sandwich” (hurr durr!) are so freaking ugly.

My experience is that guys who treat women like actual human beings, don’t try to push boundaries, and don’t make a big deal out of bare skin can end up around exposed boobs in quantities that would cause Urbanredneck’s eyes to pop out of his head like a cartoon character (and no, not at a strip club). But I don’t think he really believes that other people lead lives radically different than his own.

Same here, and well said.

The thing I most don’t get is the whole posturing seems like an “alpha male” thing, but real alpha men don’t turn into blubbering idiots at the sight of boobs.

He’d better hope they do. 'Cause some guys don’t like boobs so much as they like other guys’ butts. I’m thinking he’s the kind of guy who wouldn’t like it very much being regarded as a convenient warm hole to be bred.

But I’m sure he won’t mind since no one has touched and he hasn’t noticed anyone seen to be looking.

For me, I can usually do that. But the constancy with which he does this has a way of getting irritating. If I actually started Pit threads, I might have pitted him once or twice, just when I was having a bad day.

See, that’s the paradox. He’s basically infantile. I can see how an obsession with gigantic mammaries may be a holdover from infanthood. From an actual tiny infant’s perspective, all boobs resemble the moon, I suppose. They’re vast, globular and high up. And who else can’t control their impulses? Infants. They’re the only ones who might be excused for grabbing a mammary without asking, and for throwing tantrums if they’re gently pushed aside, since it might be a bad time for that kind of thing at that particular moment.

Now, take someone like that, make them physically big enough to hit grown-ups, and you more or less get Urbanredneck.

Well, who else hasn’t yet developed enough empathy to consider that other people have perspectives that differ from their own? Infants.

What is ‘staring’? 1 second? 5? More? I’ve never been accused of staring, but I’ve caught myself a few times (hopefully before anyone noticed!) distracted by nice looking boobs/ass/face/etc. (I figure the guy named Chronos should have the answer to my time based questions - didn’t notice that until just before I hit submit:))