Hillary Clinton is responsible for the 'Obama is a Muslim' smear.

I’m going to +1 for the notion that this rumor didn’t require starting. Muslim name, father with connections to Islam, spent time as a child in a majority Muslim country… given the rampant Islamophobia in this country, the rumor basically starts itself. Why bother looking for the source?

As other evidence pointed, Clinton was not behind it.

(Bold and Underline added)

Nor, as I did notice you attempted to refute it with little success, the invention of the “Obama is a Muslim” smear.

Judge: Mr. Hutz w’ve been in here for four hours. Do you have any evidence at all?
Hutz: Well, Your Honor. We’ve plenty of hearsay and conjecture. Those are kinds of evidence.

I forgot the link to the Snopes article:

You’re sticking with the claim “She might have benefited from it, therefore she must have done it, no matter the lack of any other evidence”, then?

You and **John **can go comfort each other.

Surely the existence of an article from 2006 debunks the claim that the rumor was started in 2007.

And, of course- even *if *Clinton’s camp was behind the “OMG Barack HUSSEIN Obama is a secret Muslim” (and there’s no real evidence they were), it was the Republicans who really weaponized it. The fact that it’s the Republican apologists who are now pushing the theory that Clinton started it should really tell you all you need to know about its veracity and their intentions.

The PBS News Hour did also take a look.

Again, no support for Clinton pushing for the ‘being a secret Muslim’ accusation or the birther lie.

One more thing:

As I pointed in the other thread: “that last bit about “Her campaign started the ‘Obama is a Muslim’ bullshit, and she went along with it” is wrong, please read the cites again.” The context shows that even your point here misses that we already acknowledged that Birtherism was not the reason for that counter evidence, it just so happens that Birtherism was **also **mentioned by the cites when that ‘Obama is a Muslim’ item was mentioned by bad conservatives and misguided Clinton supporters. And you are using that as an excuse to ignore that indeed the cites ***also ***mentioned that the ‘Obama is a Muslim’ concept was not started by Clinton or used by her.

I view it as similar to the 1988 “Willie Horton” issue. You hear a lot of righties say that Al Gore raised it first. Well, Gore did mention the existence of the prison furlough program and did point out that some of the furloughed prisoners did re-offend. What he did not do is plaster pictures of Willie Horton’s scary, and not so incidentally black, face all over the place. Rather than excuse Mr. Bush’s later use of the issue, Gore’s use put Bush’s in its proper context by showing that it was possible to raise the issue without demagoguing it.

Bush (okay Atwater) also failed to mention that the furlough program (implemented by Republican Governor Frank Sargent) had been highly successful in reducing recidivism.

Can we be totally clear, all cards on the table about this? The evidence presented that Clinton is responsible for this rumor seems to be:

  1. she benefited from it
  2. some of her supporters spread it at various points
  3. her renunciation was insufficiently vociferous

Is that it? Because unless this argument has some other legs, I can’t imagine how it stands. I benefit from tax cuts, I have friends and family who support tax cuts, and I haven’t made an effort to denounce arguments in favor of tax cuts. Does that mean I’m responsible for supply side economics?

Specifically what other legs does this argument stand on?

And,

  1. We just hates her we does … we know she did it because she’s just evil …

I love the down-the rabbit-hole logic in that article.

So someone named after his father, who had a Muslim middle name, is automatically a Muslim and is a Muslim forever, even if he thinks he’s a Christian - the poor, deluded guy!

Using that same logic I can definitively prove that I’m a member of a Great Lakes native tribe, despite the fact that both sides of my family were (documented) immigrants.

The way I see it, you offered speculation with no real evidence, and BobLibDem’s cite offered pretty convincing evidence to the contrary.

It’s kind of perplexing that you think “she must have done it because she benefitted” is more persuasive than “paid member of her staff denounces it and local campaign volunteers who forwarded the already long-running email chain lose their volunteer jobs.”

I suppose the “she must have done it because she benefitted” also means that LBJ had JFK killed.

Let’s follow this logic:

  1. TriPolar works for ABC Company.
  2. TriPolar asserts that star bellied sneetches are secret Muslims.
  3. ABC Company dispenses with TriPolar because of such statements.
  4. ABC Company would stand to benefit with increased sales and PR from the odious anti-sneetch segment of society.

Ergo, ABC Company is the one that came up with the idea that star bellied sneetches are secret Muslims. Fits in right with the OP’s argument.

It’s a win-win for Republicans. Get a rumor going against one Democrat. And then get a second rumor going that it was another Democrat who started the first rumor.

“Let’s you and him fight!”

If either one responds to the rumor in *any *way, just say that means it’s true. We have evidence right here that it works.

LBJ was a woman?