Hillary goes down: what happens next?

There was some congressional district somewhere (I don’t think it was this one) that went to ridiculous lengths to create a majority-black district. The district followed a highway, picking up small disconnected areas on either side. The joke was that you could drive down the highway with your doors open and hit everyone in the district.

My principles? Which of my principles would I be selling out if I had the magic power to “end racial gerrymandering” (even if I remotely accepted the premise that the current situation is entirely due to racial gerrymandering, which it patently isn’t)?

North Carolina’s 12th District.

Members of the Democrat Party gerrymander. Members of the Republican Party gerrymander. Gerrymandering can be partisan, and it can also achieve goals for ethnic representation.

If you were to believe the Democrats, “only” Republicans gerrymander. Which is pure horsepoop but makes for a good sound-bite.

If you study the Illinois 4th Congressional District, the district was created to enable a Spanish-speaking constituency to elect a Spanish-speaking, and looking, representative. If they end racial gerrymandering, Democrat Rep Luis Gutierrez will be forced to look for honest work. :slight_smile:

There are two kinds of gerrymandering, that intended to produce partisan advantage, and that intended to produce incumbent advantage. Oddly enough, these often work at cross purposes to each other. But both are bad, and should be stopped.

And since we’re talking about the presidential election here, gerrymandering is moot. Except maybe in Nebraska and Maine, but what do they matter?

It meant 1 more EV for Obama in Nebraska in 2008, but they’ve since repealed their law. Maine’s 2 districts have not split since they passed theirs.