Yes or no
:smack:
Absolutely not. She’s tried twice and failed twice. She needs to step aside and let the younger generation lead the party.
She lost due to foreign interference yet won
the popular vote by a huge margin.
I actually like Hillary but at this point I don’t think she’s electable.
She demoralizes the democratic base and energizes the GOP base. That won’t help us.
Also she has had 2 tries so far, let someone else do it now. But then again, so has Biden and I would support him for president. But Biden doesn’t energize the GOP base like Hillary does.
Poll needs a “Fuck No” option. (I’m Dem)
Way too many people hate her, and I’m really tired of hearing about her email.
No , and I endorsed her and voted for her in the primary and general. The only losing candidate in my lifetime who deserved a do-over was Al Gore.
I recall what Mark Steyn said about Hillary back in 2015 when the campaign was just getting started:
Hillary, by contrast, is in trouble not because she’s a sleazy, corrupt, cronyist, money-laundering, Saud-kissing liar. Democrats have a strong stomach and boundless tolerance for all of that and wouldn’t care were it not for the fact that she’s a dud and a bore. A “Hillary rally” is a contradiction in terms: the thin, vetted crowd leave more demoralized and depressed than when they went in. To vote for Bernie is to be part of a romance, as it was with Obama. To vote for Hillary is to validate the Clintons’ indestructible sense of their own indispensability - and nothing else. Hillary is a wooden charmless stiff who supposedly has enough money to be carefully managed across the finish line. But that requires Democratic electors to agree to be managed, too, and the Sanders surge is a strong sign that, while they’re relaxed about voting for an unprincipled arrogant phony marinated in ever more malodorous and toxic corruption, they draw the line at such a tedious and charisma-free specimen thereof.
Maybe Hillary is still popular among those who either write for the New York Times or read it and take it seriously, but I think that even among Democrats, the majority now understand the problem with Hillary. She’s charmless, humorless, gaffe-prone, unable to think on her feet or convince anybody that she’s sincere when pretending to care about the working class. She’s managed to lose two presidential campaigns that everyone assumed she would easily win.
Your concern is noted. I’m always suspicious of conservatives who want to give the Dems advice…
I voted yes because I figured, SOMEONE has to do it. Was astonished to find that three other people must have had the very same idea.
Exactly.
No. BUT, if something really bad happens, and the real candidate is ruined by some revelation, I can see her being drafted at the last minute.
Alternatively, she only managed to get a little over 2% more of the popular vote than Donald Fucking Trump, and could not get a popular-vote majority, even though she was running against Donald Fucking Trump. And, yes, absolutely, the Russians, and Comey, and the Mainstream Media not knowing how to cover Donald Fucking Trump, and several decades of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy smearing her with just the most ludicrous nonsense (from the “murder” of Vincent Foster to “Pizzagate”), and most of all–more than all of the rest of that put together–a Republican Party so debased and degraded that it nominated Donald Fucking Trump as its candidate for the office of President of the United States, and then turned out to vote for him.
But even so, an election against Donald Fucking Trump should have been a fucking landslide, and instead she lost.
People can blame Putin all they want, but did Putin stop Hillary from campaigning in Wisconsin?
Winning a popular-vote majority is not as common as you think. Even Bill didnt do it- twice.
But you see- You’re wrong that it shoudl have been a landslide, since we really didnt know how bad he was going to be. Many independent and progressive voters voted 3rd party or stayed home. They were brainwashed into thinking there wasnt much difference between the two.
Trumps winning really wasnt that surprising in retrospect. The rust belt states wanted someone to lie to them.
The last time the nominee of a major party lost the election, and was nominated again later, was Richard Nixon. The last time a Democrat nominee lost the election, and was nominated again, was Adlai Stevenson. And he lost again. If the DNC has any knowledge of history, they will not nominate her again. She has the stink of failure all over her.
That said, as a Trump supporter, I hope they do.
That likely didnt matter:
*Here’s the thing, though: The evidence suggests those decisions didn’t matter very much. In fact, Clinton’s ground game advantage over Trump may have been as large as the one Obama had over Mitt Romney in 2012. It just wasn’t enough to save the Electoral College for her.
There are several major problems with the idea that Clinton’s Electoral College tactics cost her the election. For one thing, winning Wisconsin and Michigan — states that Clinton is rightly accused of ignoring — would not have sufficed to win her the Electoral College. She’d also have needed Pennsylvania, Florida or another state where she campaigned extensively. *
I still don’t get why people continue to babble incessantly about the popular vote. It is exactly as relevant as saying That since Hillary was shorter than Trump, Hillary should have won because the winner of the “who is shortest” contest should be the president.
I mean, it’s cute to make up rules and say that by those made up walls your candidate technically one, but Trumps fat ass is sitting behind the oval office chair, not Hillary’s.
Short of a constitutional convention or an amendment the winner of the electoral college wins the presidency and every other measure is meaningless jacking off.
On the other hand, as a Republican Who is concerned about judicial nominees, I fully encourage this kind of silly magical thinking and urge the Dems to run Hillary again and again and again and again.
Anyone with so little smarts or charisma as to lose against Donald fucking Trump (who, after Hillary was the second stupidest campaigner in history) is a ungodly bad candidate.