jwg: I agree with your sentiment, but I have to make fun of something you said:
If Hillary was able to pay less taxes because of Bill’s affair, then by God, she is the smartest person I’ve ever met.
And Ike- don’t assume what right-wingers think just because of the ravings of one lunatic. Otherwise, I’ll have to ask why you still call your home city Hymie-town. (grin)
JMCJ
This is not a sig.
uke
What cave did you reside in? Hello? Everyone on the Left used to say that Barbara Bush’s picture was on a one dollar bill, which I thought was hysterical.
You can destroy your now by worrying about tomorrow. Janis Joplin
jwg
While she was “First Lady” in Arkansa, Bill was having a 12 year affair with Jennifer Flowersand reading the scores in the schools went down. Yeah, Hillary, buffalo butt is realllllll smart. Duh
The size of her ass has nothing to do with, and is actually inverse, to the size of her brain.
You can destroy your now by worrying about tomorrow. Janis Joplin
yeah, she really was reading the scores in the school as they went down. Should be, the reading scores in the schools went down.
I hadn’t realized you were an Arkansas graduate, John.
Dive
You’re very perceptive, Dive, I’m against big business when they damage the environment, to the point that I would close their ass down til they made right what they screwed up. A snaildarter is more important to me than a new car factory.
Wish we could go back to the horse, but keep the PC’s.
You can destroy your now by worrying about tomorrow. Janis Joplin
Yep, tom, graduated summa cum lousy.
**Hillary Deserves an ‘F’ in Education;Hillary (and Bill) Did Nothing to Improve Arkansas Schools **
An op-ed written by New York Senate candidate Hillary Lardass Clinton on her “education record”, belongs in a high school library – in the fiction section.
In today’s Daily News, Hillary argues that she has the experience to improve New York schools because she ‘chaired a committee to improve education in Arkansas.’ What she neglects to mention is that she deserves an ‘F’ for her school work in Arkansas.
According to one recent book: “(F)rom 1984 to 1992, education spending in Arkansas more than doubled and the state had little to show for it.(1)” A Wall Street Journal article points out that despite her efforts in Arkansas, “the 1992 ACT (American College) test scores (were) exactly the same as they were in 1972.”
What a phony. AND SHE’S GOT AN ASS TO MATCH. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
You can destroy your now by worrying about tomorrow. Janis Joplin
I won’t comment on the general issue, but let me note that the percentage of the Yale Law School students that were female was much smaller when she entered in 1967 than it is now. It may have only been about 5%. And for what it’s worth, she graduated first in her class there.
Guess what, John John, the Wall Street Journal is hardly an unbiased source. (Do you regularly read their editorials? Then you should know that editorially they’re pretty conservative and hardly likely to favor Hillary Clinton.) It appears that the ACT scores nationwide were about the same in 1992 as in 1972. I can’t find a table giving the trend in ACT scores, but I know that the trend in SAT scores was a decline from about 1960 to about 1980 and then an increase from 1980 till the present. I think the same is true for ACT scores. Giving the scores in Arkansas from 1972 to 1992 as if that were some measure of Hillary Clinton’s powers is deceptive in two ways. First, as I said, you want to look at the trend in Arkansas as compared to the trend nationwide, not the trend in Arkansas by itself. Second, why would someone use the scores from 1972 to 1992? What did Hillary Clinton have to do with the change in the scores from long before Bill Clinton became governor and she became involved with education there? She didn’t even move to Arkansas till 1975. The Wall Street Journal was being deliberatively deceptive in using 1972 as the first year of this comparison. A more appropriate year to use would be 1980, when Hillary Clinton became involved with education in Arkansas. The ACT scores did rise from 1980 to 1992.
Incidentally, Arkansas doesn’t have the lowest ACT scores in the country. Check out this URL:
http://www.act.org/news/data/99/99states.html
Alabama, D.C., Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and West Virginia all have lower average scores, while Texas has the same average score as Arkansas.
Once again, do you actually believe that the size of someone’s ass has anything to do with whether they should be elected? Do you actually believe that Hillary Clinton’s ass is large? I still want to know if you are stupid, insane, or merely willing to lie about anything to make a point in an argument.
W W, you forgot “d) all of the above.”
Wendell, I’m going to go with insane.
With a boatful of stupidity thrown in.
Wendell, I’ll go with “stupid” and “willing to lie about anything to make a point in an argument”. I don’t see any compelling evidence for “insane”, but I think it was an oversight on your part to leave out “ignorant”.
TomH
TomH boyo, this sounds like self analysis. Poor lad. Now, talk about asses, NO ONE COULD BEAT BUTCHER THATCHER’s KERNSEY RUMP. Moo
I think I’ll give thanks each day that you reside in Gin Alley, London and are not part of our election process. Red Coat!
Wendell
Wendell? Oh, Wendell? Helloooooo? Anybody home? Hillary, ox rear, boasted how she was going to boost scores FROM WHAT THEY HAD BEEN. She did NOT. She has NO public accomplishemnts to her credit. She is a self absorbed sow.
Wendell, what is it about her bovine ass that you delight in? Do you have any idea what her Charmin bill is for one month? It exceeds the GDP of most countries. This country will never get out of debt if we have to keep funding her toilet tissue bill.
Hillary, tissue? I hardly know you.
You can destroy your now by worrying about tomorrow. Janis Joplin
tomndebb
This is not like you, Thomas.
You can destroy your now by worrying about tomorrow. Janis Joplin
Why some Democrats are funding Giulani, and many are not even from NY.
A random telephone sampling of some donors:
``I detest her’’ said Gerald Armstrong of Eagan, Minn., who gave $500.
``She’s a pathological liar,’’ said James Cunningham, of Shreveport, La., a $50 donor.
``We think Hillary Clinton is a sleazeball,’’ said Patricia Johnson, of North Falmouth, Mass., whose husband donated $250.
``I just hate Hillary, plain and simple,’’ said Louis Kreditor of Dallas, who contributed $100.
**`the darling of the radical left-wing elite,’ among other things. **
Such mailings have been wildly successful. The mayor’s aides estimate 40 percent of the $11.5 million he has raised has come from his direct-mail drives. Many donors are from outside New York.
The Giuliani campaign said 90,000 donors gave an average of $110; 63 percent gave $100 or less.
Mrs. Clinton also has raised much of her $8 million from outside her newly adopted home state, but she has so far received larger donations from fewer donors.
You can destroy your now by worrying about tomorrow. Janis Joplin
John John, Are women to be judged on anything other than the size of their arses?
It’s Gin Lane. As I said, you’re ignorant. And I think that Beer Street is more appropriate in my case 
TomH
tomH
Warm beer is NOT beer, it’s swill. Hey, Tom, this Bud fer you. ohhhhh Britania no longer rides the wave.
I have not forgiven you Red Coats for buring the White House and Library of Congress, not to mention the “press gangs”
AMERICANS, fellow countrymen, AVENGE 1812!
You can destroy your now by worrying about tomorrow. Janis Joplin
Correction:
Wendell, after that last post, I will go with “insane” as well.