I’m not very good analytical breakdown of each individual posts looking for PIS so instead I’ll stay focused on the voting record of Suburban Plankton.
Day 1 - He votes for Idle Thoughts (sound familiar?) and is joined at different times by scum Scuba Ben and Pleonast before they switch to Ushi.
Day 2 - He builds a case against Chipacabra that’s so good, Cookies kills him during Night.
Day 3 - Votes Cookies for killing even though she followed his argument. Unvotes later and switches to storyteller
Day 4 - Day of mourning
Day 5 - Votes Chronos. After Red Skeezix asks everyone to choose between Ben and Cookies, Suburban finally votes for scum in the entire game by switching to Ben. However, this is after Scuba Ben is already mathematically eliminated (up 5:3, would win any tiebreaker, and Cookies still needed to switch her vote)
Day 6 - Votes Idle Thoughts
Going through his posts again, I found this beautiful nugget.
That’s real classy. Smudge someone that tried to help. :rolleyes: My argument had nothing to do with Suburban Plankton’s innocence or guilt. My problem was that Pleonast didn’t have an argument. He was positing metagame possibilities when it didn’t need any based on the conversation in the thread. Reading it again, I still don’t know if scummy Plankton was informed ahead of time about Scuba or not, but it doesn’t matter. He didn’t need that information to make the post he did.